2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase for detection of semen in vaginal swabs from raped women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the detection of PSA and ACP on semen-stained under wares could be indicative of an incidence of sexual intercourse. This finding concurred with a similar study by Peonim et al 19 on the utilization of seminal biomarkers in determining the occurrence of sexual intercourse.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, the detection of PSA and ACP on semen-stained under wares could be indicative of an incidence of sexual intercourse. This finding concurred with a similar study by Peonim et al 19 on the utilization of seminal biomarkers in determining the occurrence of sexual intercourse.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Traditionally, an observed cut‐off time of 2 min for recording a positive response has been used by many laboratories, with response time at 2 min or longer often considered to be more indicative of a vaginal acid phosphatase (VAP) response. There are competing objectives of sensitivity and specificity with some researchers arguing that times of up to 10 min or longer (Lewis, Jones, Baxter, Siemieniuk, & Talbot, ; Redhead & Brown, ) should be considered, while others suggest reducing the time to as little as 15 s would increase the specificity and reduce the likelihood of false positives (Peonim et al, ).…”
Section: Forensic Tests For Semenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the test is simple, cheap, and rapid there can be issues with reproducibility due to temperature variation at the scene, causing changes in evaporation of the sample [22]. The acid phosphatase (AP) test for semen has been in routine use as early as the 1940s [23], but due to its relatively high falsepositive rate [24] it is unable to be used to as a confirmatory test and has recently been sidelined in favour of immunoassay approaches [25]. A considerable advantage of chemical tests is their low pertest cost, but this is often at the expense of specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Chemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%