2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between postoperative TRUS-CT fusion with MRI-CT fusion for postimplant quality assurance in prostate LDR permanent seed brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expense related to this, however, prohibits its routine utilization in clinical practice. Moreover, studies have shown that TRUS and CT could be reasonable alternatives to MR in determining dosimetric parameters [ 35 , 36 ]. From a clinical perspective, it remains controversial whether these parameters related to intraoperative dosimetry could predict or positively correlate with biochemical outcomes after LDR BT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expense related to this, however, prohibits its routine utilization in clinical practice. Moreover, studies have shown that TRUS and CT could be reasonable alternatives to MR in determining dosimetric parameters [ 35 , 36 ]. From a clinical perspective, it remains controversial whether these parameters related to intraoperative dosimetry could predict or positively correlate with biochemical outcomes after LDR BT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%