2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between open plating versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
29
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
29
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to a clinically relevant non-union rate and limited functional results following the conservative management of these lesions, there has been a trend towards surgical fixation of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle [2,3]. While open reduction and plate fixation allows optimal anatomic reposition and stable fixation [4], a relevant risk of postoperative complications, including wound-healing problems, implant malposition and failure has been described [5]. Elastic intramedullary nailing (ESIN) has been proposed as an alternative minimal-invasive method for the operative treatment of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to a clinically relevant non-union rate and limited functional results following the conservative management of these lesions, there has been a trend towards surgical fixation of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle [2,3]. While open reduction and plate fixation allows optimal anatomic reposition and stable fixation [4], a relevant risk of postoperative complications, including wound-healing problems, implant malposition and failure has been described [5]. Elastic intramedullary nailing (ESIN) has been proposed as an alternative minimal-invasive method for the operative treatment of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover reoperation in our study was 0%, total, complication was only 4% and non-consolidation was similar to other series. 14,15 Very less percentage of considerable pain and dissatisfaction was reported as assessed by VAS at one year follow up from injury. With 14% pain and 0% dissatisfaction results indicated no signs of non-union and post operation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimally invasive technique has become a popular surgical modality as it offers biological bone healing with the protection of fracture hematoma since the fracture line is not opened and less soft tissue and periosteal damage occurs with protection of periosteal circulation [10]. In the comparisons with open reduction and plate fixation in several recent studies, the minimally invasive technique has been shown to be successful at a satisfactory level [8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the principle of causing less injury to soft tissue, protecting periosteal circulation, and providing fracture recovery with secondary callus formation through indirect reduction [8]. The technique is used very often in clavicular fractures in certain circumstances when there is difficulty in obtaining anatomic reduction, orthe proximity to the local neurovascular structures, or the high-risk of injury to these structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%