2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between open and thoracoscopic resection of congenital lung lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
49
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Six retrospective studies were identified and were included in this study [1][2][3][4][5][6]. None were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Six retrospective studies were identified and were included in this study [1][2][3][4][5][6]. None were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thoracoscopic resection of congenital lung lesions has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible procedure in a number of series [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Several comparative studies have been published evaluating both the open and the minimally invasive approach with inconsistent results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature there are few reports on treatment of CLE with thoracoscopic approach while most of it in childhood [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Thus, in adult we found one case report by Muramatsu [24] while no long-term follow up or pulmonary function improvements were mentioned.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It has been suggested that resection in symptomatic patients is technically more challenging because of chronic inflammatory changes [11], and therefore, it can be associated with higher morbidity. As minimally invasive techniques are increasingly adopted, thoracoscopic surgery may prove to be a safe and less morbid alternative to an open procedure [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%