2015
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000000309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation and Standard Oxygen Therapy in Children Up to 3 Years Old With Respiratory Failure After Extubation

Abstract: The study indicates that a larger randomized trial comparing noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and standard oxygen therapy in children with respiratory failure is feasible, providing a basis for a future trial in this setting. No differences were seen between groups. The number of excluded patients was high.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous single-center studies demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of NIV in the management of respiratory insufficiency in infants and children [1-3], including those undergoing cardiac surgery [4-8]. NIV therapy may hold promise to decrease ICU length of stay, complications associated with invasive respiratory support, and improve other clinical outcomes for patients in the CICU by allowing reduction in mechanical ventilation (MV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous single-center studies demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of NIV in the management of respiratory insufficiency in infants and children [1-3], including those undergoing cardiac surgery [4-8]. NIV therapy may hold promise to decrease ICU length of stay, complications associated with invasive respiratory support, and improve other clinical outcomes for patients in the CICU by allowing reduction in mechanical ventilation (MV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Tume et al reported a 52% use ‘to avoid intubation, Fanning et al found 81% of participants reporting a willingness to use NIV in high‐risk extubation failure. Fioretto et al did not find any significant difference between NIV (delivered by means of a face or nasal mask and a conventional ventilator) and standard oxygen therapy after extubation. Further research on this topic is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is scarce information about the use and effectiveness of NIV after extubation in children. The use of NIV immediately after endotracheal tube removal (as part of the weaning process), has been proven to be useful in some adult patients, while this has not been shown in children to date . On the other hand, NIV has not shown to be effective when ARF ensues after extubation in adult patients …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role for NIV in children developing acute respiratory failure (ARF) after extubation has been recently evaluated in a RCT [21] comparing NPPV and standard oxygen therapy for preventing reintubation in children. One hundred eight children undergoing invasive ventilation for at least 48 h with respiratory failure after programmed extubation were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned into NPPV group and inhaled oxygen group.…”
Section: Noninvasive Ventilation In Pediatric Icumentioning
confidence: 99%