2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Neural Network and Support Vector Machine in Optical Character Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive comparative study of different classification algorithms applied to Baybayin scripts is also an interesting research direction. Similar to what was shown in Phangtriastu, Harefa & Tanoto (2017), other feature extraction algorithms can be combined with SVM to identify which will work well in classifying Baybayin scripts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comprehensive comparative study of different classification algorithms applied to Baybayin scripts is also an interesting research direction. Similar to what was shown in Phangtriastu, Harefa & Tanoto (2017), other feature extraction algorithms can be combined with SVM to identify which will work well in classifying Baybayin scripts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Many script character recognition systems have been reported with SVM as classifiers. In their experiments, Phangtriastu, Harefa & Tanoto (2017) have shown that SVM can achieve an accuracy of 94.43%, and is better when compared to Artificial Neural Network. Tautu & Leon (2012) have studied how SVM can be used to classify handwritten Latin letters, and obtained over 90% precision when tests were implemented on small or capital Latin letters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ghorpade & Katkar, 2014) melakukan penelitian untuk mempelajari algoritma Haar Transform dan Backpropagation Neural Network dengan studi kasus kompresi image, dan penelitian tersebut menghasilkan pernyataan metode Haar Transform dan Backprogaration Neural Network cocok untuk kompresi image dikarenakan menghasilkan image yang memiliki ukuran file kecil tetapi kekurangannya gambar tersebut menjadi pecah pikselnya sehingga untuk studi kasus penelitian ini tidak cocok diterapkan. (Phangtriastu, Harefa, & Tanoto, 2017) melakukan penelitian untuk membanding algoritma Neural Network dengan Support Vector Machine (SVM) menggunakan metode Optical Character Recognition (OCR), dan penelitian ini menghasilkan bahwa metode SVM tidak cocok untuk OCR sehingga diberikan opsi dengan penggabungan antara OCR dan Template Matching dan menghasilkan tingkat akurasi lebih dari 90%. Sehingga metode OCR menjadi landasan yang kuat dalam implementasi pada kasus ini.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Other Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based techniques were used to detect the registration plate area and character segmentation [5,6]. A comparative study of ANNs and SVMs were conducted and results showed that the majority of the experiments are in favor of ANNs [7]. A subset on ANNs is Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs).…”
Section: Socmentioning
confidence: 99%