2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between muscle activation measured by electromyography and muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography for effective muscle assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was essential to include measurements during contraction, especially for determination of facial muscle function. This has recently also been shown for trunk muscles …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was essential to include measurements during contraction, especially for determination of facial muscle function. This has recently also been shown for trunk muscles …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This has recently also been shown for trunk muscles. 18 Ultrasonography of facial muscles affected by facial neuropathy may close the diagnostic gap in the first 14 days after onset when EMG does not unfold its full potential, as degenerative changes do not reach the target muscles before 10-14 days after onset. 2,19 Neuropathy seems to lead to rapid changes in ultrasonographic muscle parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique provides a unique insight into the activation patterns of the core musculature due to its ability to measure the activation of individual muscles without interference from other muscles. Measuring the activation of deep muscles, such as the IO and TA, is not feasible with either sEMG or intramuscular EMG due to limitations such as crosstalk, signal cancelation, and invasiveness of the procedure [33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between ultrasound and EMG in muscle activation is worth highlighting [53]. In this study, muscles at rest and at maximum voluntary contraction were assessed in 30 healthy volunteers, yielding a correlation between ultrasound measurements and EMG monitoring of r = 0.51-0.61, which leads to the ultrasound increasingly being considered as a tool for measuring the activity.…”
Section: Observational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%