1988
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90093-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between modified skin prick test with standardized allergen extracts and Phazet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum‐specific IgE levels were measured using the CAP System ® (Pharmacia Diagnostics) in a central laboratory (16) (except for the Australian centre). The allergen‐coated Phazet ® (Pharmacia Diagnostics) was used for skin testing (17). A histamine positive control and a saline negative control were also skin tested to reduce false positives and negatives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum‐specific IgE levels were measured using the CAP System ® (Pharmacia Diagnostics) in a central laboratory (16) (except for the Australian centre). The allergen‐coated Phazet ® (Pharmacia Diagnostics) was used for skin testing (17). A histamine positive control and a saline negative control were also skin tested to reduce false positives and negatives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this test has been previously evaluated (2). The criterion for inclusion in the study was a positive skin test for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified skin prick test introduced by Pepys (1163) is the current reference method. Puncture tests with various devices were introduced to decrease the variability of skin prick tests (1164)(1165)(1166)(1167)(1168)(1169)(1170)(1171)(1172)(1173). With a trained investigator, they are highly reproducible (1171)(1172)(1173).…”
Section: Skin Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%