2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Models of Rock Discontinuity Strength and Deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terms a 0 , a n , b n e T F are determined by interpolating the dilation vs. shear displacement curve, as obtained by direct shear tests. Indraratna et al (2005Indraratna et al ( , 2010aIndraratna et al ( , 2010b and Oliveira & Indraratna (2010) have shown that the model proposed by Indraratna & Haque (2000) can predict the shear behavior of unfilled rock discontinuities, but they also highlight the difficulties involved in obtaining its parameters because the results of laboratory tests are required and may not be easily available. Note also that the experimental data can only represent the field behavior if the boundary conditions imposed in laboratory tests are the same as those observed in the field, a fact that is not always possible, due to the limitations of the test equipment and the sampling process (Dantas Neto et al, 2017).…”
Section: Practical Application Of the Fuzzy Model In A Rock Slope Stamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms a 0 , a n , b n e T F are determined by interpolating the dilation vs. shear displacement curve, as obtained by direct shear tests. Indraratna et al (2005Indraratna et al ( , 2010aIndraratna et al ( , 2010b and Oliveira & Indraratna (2010) have shown that the model proposed by Indraratna & Haque (2000) can predict the shear behavior of unfilled rock discontinuities, but they also highlight the difficulties involved in obtaining its parameters because the results of laboratory tests are required and may not be easily available. Note also that the experimental data can only represent the field behavior if the boundary conditions imposed in laboratory tests are the same as those observed in the field, a fact that is not always possible, due to the limitations of the test equipment and the sampling process (Dantas Neto et al, 2017).…”
Section: Practical Application Of the Fuzzy Model In A Rock Slope Stamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the period of design, construction and operation of underground caverns, the excavation period is short but important, and excavation disasters caused by groundwater seepage are common [8,[21][22][23]. During excavation, the potential seepage boundary is formed immediately on the wall of the caverns and drainage system, but the descent of groundwater is a hysteretic result of the water retention capability of soil and rock mass [12,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on underground cavern excavation have focused on the stability analysis of rock mass [9,[26][27][28][29]. Chen et al [23] and Oliverira and Indraratn [21] investigated the change in rock mass hydraulic conductivity during excavation, but their transient seepage analysis, although important, is still limited [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%