2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between microwave hydrodiffusion and pressing for plum juice extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a trial with Songold (a Japanese plum but not a blood plum), no difference in total phenolic content or carotenoid content was seen between high‐pressure processed and thermally treated juice . Another technology, microwave hydrodiffusion, has been trialled with a European plum variety, but juice yield was significantly lower than that obtained by thermal treatment/enzyme treatment/press process . Furthermore, the content of phytochemicals was generally lower in juice made using microwave hydrodiffusion, with estimated yields of the different phytochemicals as follows: 26–57% of anthocyanins recovered, 48–180% of flavonols recovered, 44–275% of phenolic acids recovered and 5–23% of procyanidins recovered …”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a trial with Songold (a Japanese plum but not a blood plum), no difference in total phenolic content or carotenoid content was seen between high‐pressure processed and thermally treated juice . Another technology, microwave hydrodiffusion, has been trialled with a European plum variety, but juice yield was significantly lower than that obtained by thermal treatment/enzyme treatment/press process . Furthermore, the content of phytochemicals was generally lower in juice made using microwave hydrodiffusion, with estimated yields of the different phytochemicals as follows: 26–57% of anthocyanins recovered, 48–180% of flavonols recovered, 44–275% of phenolic acids recovered and 5–23% of procyanidins recovered …”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying physical methods of pulp treatment may reduce the negative alterations in the raw material and, as a result, in juice [19]. For physical pulp pretreatment, the following methods are used: ohmic heating [20], pulsed electric field [21,22], electro-osmosis [23], radiation [24], microwave heating [25,26], sonication [27], as well as freezing and thawing of the pulp [13,28,29]. Freezing is used to preserve foods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been observed that the functional properties of the product can be significantly altered by the elimination of chemical methods and procedures. Before pressing, the following methods can be used in the pre-treatment of the product: microwave heating (Cendres et al, 2012), ohmic heating (Praporscic et al, 2006), pulsed electric fields processing (Parniakov et al, 2014), sonification (Jabbar et al, 2014) and radiation (Mitchel et al, 1991). A relatively low impact on modifications of pro-health properties of food containing rhubarb is documented (Sun, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%