2009
DOI: 10.1021/ef8008103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between MAT Flow Fixed Bed and Batch Fluidized Bed Reactors in the Evaluation of FCC Catalysts. 1. Conversion and Yields of the Main Hydrocarbon Groups

Abstract: A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, in the pilot unit an increase in the C/O augments the space-velocity, which ultimately leads to more pronounced deltas in feed conversion. In the bench scale testing, in contrast, the space time is independent of the C/O and the variation in the conversion is induced by changes in the degree of catalyst deactivation by coke, as was stated elsewhere [21,29]. Also noted in Figs.…”
Section: Bench Scale Versus Pilot Scalementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, in the pilot unit an increase in the C/O augments the space-velocity, which ultimately leads to more pronounced deltas in feed conversion. In the bench scale testing, in contrast, the space time is independent of the C/O and the variation in the conversion is induced by changes in the degree of catalyst deactivation by coke, as was stated elsewhere [21,29]. Also noted in Figs.…”
Section: Bench Scale Versus Pilot Scalementioning
confidence: 75%
“…The cracking of heavy fraction, given in terms of the bottoms selectivity, is not significantly different for the two reactor configurations. Most of these trends are [23,28,29]. A hydrodynamics effect, presumably associated to a lower concentration of catalyst particles in a pilot plant riser than that in a non circulating bench scale reactor, is a reasonable explanation for the smaller conversion observed in the pilot plant testing [23].…”
Section: Bench Scale Versus Pilot Scalementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The lower unit cell size and content of rare earth elements that provide a higher hydrothermal resistance to FCC catalysts 39,40 in catalyst ECAT-D, as compared to those in catalyst ECAT-R, are typical in octane-barrel catalysts, where both the gasoline yield and quality (RON) are expected to be maximized. 38 The results of acidity characterization are shown in Table 3 and Figure 1. It can be seen that the total acidity in catalyst ECAT-D, as given by the amount of pyridine remaining adsorbed after desorption at 150 °C, was significantly higher than that in catalyst ECAT-R.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the fluidized bed in the CREC Riser Simulator reactor allows for a more efficient catalyst−reactants contact, thus avoiding the high coke yields observed in fixed bed reactors. 8,38 Figure 2 shows the conversions of all the feedstocks on the equilibrium catalysts as a function of reaction time. Even though the absolute values of conversion do not match those found in the commercial operation, 4 given the operating conditions chosen for these experiments, distinctive behaviors can be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional descriptive details can be found in Bidabehere and Sedran (2006), Al-Khattaf (2007), and Passamonti et al (2009).…”
Section: Reactor Setup and Operation Modementioning
confidence: 99%