2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between leaky and pulsed modes of ion extraction from an electron beam ion trap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ion abundance in the trap and that of the extracted ion can be different due to the different extraction efficiency depending on the charge state, we have confirmed that the ratio between adjacent charge states is consistent between the trapped and the extracted ions within 10% [40]. However, this uncertainty does not affect the measurement of the magnetic-sublevel population because of the strength ratios between the different resonant states in the same charge state, so that the difference in the extraction efficiency is completely canceled.…”
Section: A Ion-abundance Measurementssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Although the ion abundance in the trap and that of the extracted ion can be different due to the different extraction efficiency depending on the charge state, we have confirmed that the ratio between adjacent charge states is consistent between the trapped and the extracted ions within 10% [40]. However, this uncertainty does not affect the measurement of the magnetic-sublevel population because of the strength ratios between the different resonant states in the same charge state, so that the difference in the extraction efficiency is completely canceled.…”
Section: A Ion-abundance Measurementssupporting
confidence: 53%