2018
DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between invasive and noninvasive techniques of evaluation of microvascular structural alterations

Abstract: Our data suggest that adaptive optics has a substantial advantage over SLDF in terms of evaluation of microvascular morphology, as WLR measured with adaptive optics is more closely correlated with the M/L of subcutaneous small arteries (r = 0.84, P < 0.001 vs. r = 0.52, P < 0.05, slopes of the relations: P < 0.01 adaptive optics vs. SLDF). In addition, the reproducibility of the evaluation of the WLR with adaptive optics is far better, as compared with SLDF, as intraobserver and interobserver variation coeffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the need of an expert histopathological unit or special software for image processing and elaboration limits their applicability in clinical practice. 324,25 Our study underlines the role of OCT(A), as a device able to identify subclinical microvascular modifications, by means of a non-invasive and reliable retinal vascular network analysis. OCT(A) could potentially become a “multidisciplinary” instrument, not of exclusive ophthalmologist’s use, for the early diagnosis and management of several systemic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, the need of an expert histopathological unit or special software for image processing and elaboration limits their applicability in clinical practice. 324,25 Our study underlines the role of OCT(A), as a device able to identify subclinical microvascular modifications, by means of a non-invasive and reliable retinal vascular network analysis. OCT(A) could potentially become a “multidisciplinary” instrument, not of exclusive ophthalmologist’s use, for the early diagnosis and management of several systemic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The mean wall thickness was calculated from the mean values of the IWT and OWT. The wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) was calculated by dividing the mean wall thickness of the superior temporal branch of the retinal artery by the lumen diameter (LD); this was applied as a composite measure of the vessel pathology [ 4 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the technique used for the retinal microvascular imaging differs from previous techniques used for gluteal small arteries. Although this may account for the different results observed, the pressure myography has been found highly correlated with AOC (40). What is still different is that AOC captures in vivo images of retinal microvasculature, whereas pressure myography assesses arterial anatomy and physiology in standardized conditions that are exempt from physiological local stimuli.…”
Section: :3 380 Clinical Studymentioning
confidence: 86%