Comparison Between Interpositional Bone Grafting and Osteogenic Alveolar Distraction in Alveolar Bone Reconstruction

Hashemi, H.; Javidi, Babak

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.073

Cited by 26 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As an adjunctive surgical procedure to improve matrix volume on the poor periodontium for subsequent OTM, ridge augmentation with bone grafting or guided bone regeneration has been widely applied. [9][10][11][12][13][14] However, these regenerative procedures have limited success for graft survival in cases of severe tissue constriction with poor vascularity in the remaining alveolar ridge. 13 Corticotomy, or decortication, which involves removing some part of the cortical bone instead of building up matrix volume, was introduced to decrease tissue resistance in the atrophic bone based on the regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP), thereby increasing bone turnover and decreasing bone density.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional alteration of constricted alveolar ridge affected by root thrusting with and without open-flap decortication

Hwang

Lee

Kim

et al. 2017

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional alteration of constricted alveolar ridge affected by root thrusting with and without open-flap decortication

Hwang

Lee

Kim

et al. 2017

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although 1 study determined that interpositional bone grafting and alveolar distraction yielded statistically similar results about buccolingual width, it later stated that bone grafting may form a wider bone. 2 The same study advocated using distraction osteogenesis first and then placing a bone graft if the distraction osteogenesis failed, indicating the author's confidence in the sandwich osteotomy technique. No mention was made regarding the advantage gained with the copious blood supply by the sandwich osteotomy technique.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Immediate Distraction Osteogenesis

Herford¹,

Tandon²,

Stevens³

et al. 2013

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this study was to demonstrate the technique and effectiveness of incorporating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) to the established sandwich osteotomy technique. Although the success of the sandwich osteotomy procedure has been well documented, we hope to show that the addition of rhBMP-2 will enhance bone formation.We performed a sandwich osteotomy technique in patients who had been treated initially by grafting with suboptimal results. Only defects involving the anterior maxilla (3 patients) or the anterior mandible (1 patient) were included. There were 4 patients, 2 men and 2 women, with an age range of 19 to 62 years. The causes of the ridge deficiencies ranged from pathology to trauma. The height (distance) of distracted transport bone segment was measured. The amount of relapse was measured 6 months after the surgery.All patients exhibited a significant increase in bone height. The amount distracted was 6.75 mm (range, 5-11 mm). The amount of relapse was 8.5% (range, 0%-18%). Dental implants were placed in the reconstructed ridges in all patients. There were no instances of permanent paresthesia. Two patients had exposure of a portion of the hardware, which healed uneventfully.The sandwich osteotomy technique has proven to be an effective method for augmenting deficient alveolar ridges. The addition of rhBMP-2 may aid in its success rate by promoting osteogenesis at the osteotomy site, especially in multiple-operated patients where other traditional techniques have failed to gain the desired ridge height.

show abstract

“…Distraction osteogenesis is a predictable way to gain vertical bone height, which involves gradual, controlled displacement of the surgically created bone fragments that result in concurrent expansion of soft tissue and bone volume [44].…”

Section: Distraction Osteogenesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Various Treatment Options for the Single Implant in the Mandibular Anterior Region

2016

J Oral Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison Between Interpositional Bone Grafting and Osteogenic Alveolar Distraction in Alveolar Bone Reconstruction

Cited by 26 publications

References 12 publications

Three-dimensional alteration of constricted alveolar ridge affected by root thrusting with and without open-flap decortication

Three-dimensional alteration of constricted alveolar ridge affected by root thrusting with and without open-flap decortication

Immediate Distraction Osteogenesis

Various Treatment Options for the Single Implant in the Mandibular Anterior Region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About