2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-017-6753-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between inductively coupled plasma and X-ray fluorescence performance for Pb analysis in environmental soil samples

Abstract: Comparison of two conventional analytical techniques such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for measuring Pb concentrations in soil samples was achieved using field and laboratory work. Seventy-three samples were collected from urban areas surrounding the large lead smelter at South Australia, as an indicator of the environment impact of smelter activity. Soil Pb concentrations were determined using hand-held XRF analyser under laboratory conditions. ICP-MS a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination values for As, Cu, Ni, Mn and Fe were between 0.70 and 0.97, showing excellent comparability between the XRF and ICP-MS data 17. The slopes of the regression lines for As, Cu, Ni, Mn and Fe were between 0.73 and 1.40, suggesting that very little data correction is needed to match the XRF data to that of the ICP-MS 41…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of determination values for As, Cu, Ni, Mn and Fe were between 0.70 and 0.97, showing excellent comparability between the XRF and ICP-MS data 17. The slopes of the regression lines for As, Cu, Ni, Mn and Fe were between 0.73 and 1.40, suggesting that very little data correction is needed to match the XRF data to that of the ICP-MS 41…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these drawbacks, elemental analysis by XRF has proven to correlate well with commonly used laboratory methods such as atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [7,16,17]. Yet, soil datasets in these comparative studies were often limited to a few samples (<50) [11,18,19], a few elements (1)(2) [20][21][22][23][24], or to a restricted study area with similar land use or similar parent material [11,13,21,25,26]. Additionally, only a few studies have investigated the impact of different XRF scanners by comparing their mutual performances [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 A t test, which assumed equal variances assessed any significant differences of mean concentrations obtained from the 2 methods by comparing their tabulated t value with that of 95% significance level. Ahmed et al 23 and Maliki et al 24 did a similar statistical manipulation to compare metal analysis by different techniques. Linear regression analysis was used to correlate results of the 2 methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean concentrations of various elements for the 2 techniques were compared using t-test (α = 0.05) as shown in Table 3. This method has been used in comparative analysis of methods for metals analyses as documented by Maliki et al 24 in a comparative study of XRF and ICP-MS for Pb analysis. Similarly, Nardi et al 27 used the method to compare metals in foods using ICP-MS and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) techniques.…”
Section: T-test Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%