Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546)
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2001.934337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Genetic Network Programming (GNP) and Genetic Programming (GP)

Abstract: Recently, many methods of evolutionary computation such as Genetic Algorithm(GA) and Genetic Programming(GP) have been developed as a basic tool for modeling and optimizing the complex systems. Generally speaking, GA has the genome of string structure, while the genome in GP is the tree structure. Therefore, GP is suitable to construct the complicated programs, which can be applied to many real world problems. But, GP might be sometimes difficult to search for a solution because of its bloat.In this paper, a n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other examples of graph-based GP typically contain sequentially updating nodes (e.g., [33], [20] and [43]). Schmidt and Lipson [42] have recently demonstrated a number of benefits from graph encodings over traditional trees, such as reduced bloat and increased computational efficiency.…”
Section: Graph Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples of graph-based GP typically contain sequentially updating nodes (e.g., [33], [20] and [43]). Schmidt and Lipson [42] have recently demonstrated a number of benefits from graph encodings over traditional trees, such as reduced bloat and increased computational efficiency.…”
Section: Graph Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the problem is complex, the tree size may bloat excessively. Genetic Network Programming (GNP) with a directed graph structure, is proposed to overcome the disadvantages of GP [13], [14]. The aim of developing GNP is to deal with dynamic environments efficiently by using the directed graph structure which has more general representation ability than that of trees, and the inherently equipped functions in it.…”
Section: Genetic Network Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, JCMSI 0002/10/0302-0121 c 2009 SICE it could be effective because it works like the Automatically Defined Functions (ADFs). That is, the reusability of nodes makes GNP's structure more compact than that of GP [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, GP has been used for generating graphs for Artificial Neural Networks [12], bond graphs [18], electronic circuits [15], and algorithm structures [17]. Genetic Network Programming [11] deals with the evolution of graph structures in which the numbers of nodes and their functional behaviour is fixed. Graph structured program evolution (GRAPE) as introduced by [17] is a GP technique using graph structures for generating computer programs with branches and loops.…”
Section: Ga Approaches To Process Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%