2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between fixed and Gaussian steplength in Monte Carlo simulations for diffusion processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous work [17], we have shown that the fixed steplength method exactly reproduces first and second order moments in homogeneous systems, and that the scaled error in higher order moments behaves as t −1 for t large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous work [17], we have shown that the fixed steplength method exactly reproduces first and second order moments in homogeneous systems, and that the scaled error in higher order moments behaves as t −1 for t large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, also in the homogeneous case, the fixed steplength choice has some important good features. It produces exact results in the evaluation of first and second order moments [17] (scaled errors in higher order moments behave as t −1 for t large). And, more importantly, it keeps these good features when the diffusion coefficient is non homogeneous, in contrast with the Gaussian steplength.…”
Section: Discrete Description For MC Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To account for the diffusion of aggregates, a Monte Carlo simulation was used, in which two random numbers were generated from a uniform distribution and transformed to a Gaussian distribution using the Box-Muller method in an ImageJ macro [51]. For a constant diffusion coefficient and fixed time step, a Gaussian step-length distribution is known to exactly simulate normal diffusion [52]. For a simulated pixel size of 0.125 µm and one frame per second, this corresponds to the slow diffusion of the aggregates with a diffusion constant of D = 0.004 µm 2 /s, which is comparable to experimental findings for diffusion of small eGFP-mtHtt aggregates in cells [11].…”
Section: Outline Of the Dmd Methods Applied To Fluorescence Microscop...mentioning
confidence: 99%