2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c20807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Fe2O3/C and Fe3C/Fe2O3/Fe/C Electrocatalysts for N2 Reduction in an Alkaline Electrolyte

Abstract: Cost-effective and nonprecious iron-based catalysts were synthesized, evaluated, and compared for electrocatalytic N2 reduction reaction (NRR) under alkaline conditions in the potential range from −0.4 to 0.1 V [vs reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)] at low temperature (≤60 °C) and atmospheric pressure. The tested H-type cell was separated by an anion exchange membrane in 6 M KOH alkaline electrolyte (pH = over 14) in order to minimize hydrogen evolution reaction and to directly form NH3 gas. The amount of am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…–1 and 16.4%, respectively. This optimum performance of Cu–Fe 2 O 3 -1 is comparable to or even exceeds those of recently reported Fe oxide-based electrocatalysts, , , , and the marked FE is higher than that of Zn-doped Fe 2 O 3 , as expected in the Introduction. Upon shifting the applied potential in a negative direction beyond −0.20 V, both NH 3 formation rate and FE gradually decreased because of the competing HER process (Figure S14), whereas the smaller FE observed at −0.10 V is likely due to uncontrollable experimental error and the capacitance of the carbon support. , The durability of Cu–Fe 2 O 3 -1 was evaluated by conducting a consecutive cycling test and a long-term chronoamperometry measurement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…–1 and 16.4%, respectively. This optimum performance of Cu–Fe 2 O 3 -1 is comparable to or even exceeds those of recently reported Fe oxide-based electrocatalysts, , , , and the marked FE is higher than that of Zn-doped Fe 2 O 3 , as expected in the Introduction. Upon shifting the applied potential in a negative direction beyond −0.20 V, both NH 3 formation rate and FE gradually decreased because of the competing HER process (Figure S14), whereas the smaller FE observed at −0.10 V is likely due to uncontrollable experimental error and the capacitance of the carbon support. , The durability of Cu–Fe 2 O 3 -1 was evaluated by conducting a consecutive cycling test and a long-term chronoamperometry measurement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The peaks between 45 and 60° in Figure b correspond to orthorhombic iron carbide (θ-Fe 3 C, PDF 00-035-0772). The formation of other Fe oxidation states, such as reduced Fe (53.3°), Fe 3 O 4 (41.3, 35, and 74.2°), and Fe 2 O 3 (38.6°) are inevitable by-products of the carburization process. , Also, small fractions of Fe 3 O 4 (41.4° and 74°) were identified in Figure c after the thermal decomposition of Fe(CO) 5 , while the multiplet between 49 and 55° is very typical for χ-Fe 5 C 2 (PDF 01-080-4102). The average crystallite size was calculated with the Scherrer equation (eq ) and summarized in Table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 For these reasons, a variety of Fe oxides have been extensively studied as NRR electrocatalysts. 16–29…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%