Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

Matak, Luka; Baekelandt, Jan; Šimičević, Maša; Matak, Magdalena; Mikuš, Mislav; Orešković, Slavko

doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07531-0

Arch Gynecol Obstet

2024

DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07531-0

|View full text |Cite

Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

Luka Matak,

Jan Baekelandt,

Maša Šimičević

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Biologic grafts for pelvic organ prolapse repairs: what have we learned in the last 20 years?

Lorente,

Chang

2024

Current Opinion in Obstetrics &Amp; Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of review The ideal graft material for the augmentation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has yet to be discovered. While synthetic mesh offers durable repairs this can be at the expense of mesh complications. Biologic grafts have been considered an alternative. This chapter reviews biologic graft materials as applied to POP surgery. Recent findings The heterogeneity of available graft materials and definitions of success in POP literature make comparisons difficult. There may be utility in the augmentation of apical prolapse with autologous grafts. There is also modest evidence to support anterior wall augmentation with biologic grafts. However, a 2024 Cochrane review concluded there is not enough evidence to support routine use of grafts for transvaginal repairs. Summary Biologic grafts can be considered in certain cases. There continues to be a need for finding the ideal “graft-patient” combination. The field particularly needs more robust research in the recurrent POP patient population.

show abstract

Biologic grafts for pelvic organ prolapse repairs: what have we learned in the last 20 years?

Lorente,

Chang

2024

Current Opinion in Obstetrics &Amp; Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

Cited by 1 publication

References 20 publications

Biologic grafts for pelvic organ prolapse repairs: what have we learned in the last 20 years?

Biologic grafts for pelvic organ prolapse repairs: what have we learned in the last 20 years?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About