2001
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2001.0081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between estrogenicities estimated from DNA recombinant yeast assay and from chemical analyses of endocrine disruptors during sewage treatment

Abstract: This study discusses the estrogenicity and the extent of estrogenic effects, of sewage and treated sewage in public sewage treatment plants in Japan. The estrogenicity in this study was measured with a DNA recombinant yeast strain. Using this method, 43 chemicals that are suspected to have estrogen-like effects were measured and their estrogenicities were evaluated in terms of 17 beta-estradiol equivalents by comparison with the estrogenicity of 17 beta-estradiol. 17 beta-estradiol equivalents of influent and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some water extracts exerted toxicity to the yeast cells during the bioassay, which affected development of color and further measurement of EEQ. Similar toxic effects on yeast cells have been reported previously in wastewater (Tanaka et al, 2001) and surface water (Witters et al, 2001).…”
Section: Comparison Of Estrogenicity By Yes Bioassay and Chemical Anasupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some water extracts exerted toxicity to the yeast cells during the bioassay, which affected development of color and further measurement of EEQ. Similar toxic effects on yeast cells have been reported previously in wastewater (Tanaka et al, 2001) and surface water (Witters et al, 2001).…”
Section: Comparison Of Estrogenicity By Yes Bioassay and Chemical Anasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This can be explained by the presence of unknown antagonists in the water samples (Tanaka et al, 2001;Witters et al, 2001). Some water extracts exerted toxicity to the yeast cells during the bioassay, which affected development of color and further measurement of EEQ.…”
Section: Comparison Of Estrogenicity By Yes Bioassay and Chemical Anamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from the slope of the modeling equation, we could see that the calculated EEQs from chemical analysis were higher than the measured EEQs by the YES bioassay. This suggests that some unknown compounds present in the effluents could have antagonistic action on the estrogenic activities of estrogenic compounds, which has been reported in the literature [49,50]. In fact, anti-estrogenic effects were observed in most industrial effluents (Table 1), which, to some extent, supports the viewpoint.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The disrupting activity of E2 is 1000-10,000 times greater than that of nonylphenol [3]. The hormone activity of E1, a metabolite of E2, is 0.2-0.5 times than that of E2 [3]. These pollutants have potential for high risk because they can show strong biological effects, even at very low concentrations (10´1 2 -10´9 mg/L), which could cause human body or animal reproductive dysfunction, abnormal behavior and larval mutations, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Estrone (E1) and 17β-estradiol (E2) examined in the present study are both typical estrogens and, in fact, have greater endocrine-disrupting activities. The disrupting activity of E2 is 1000-10,000 times greater than that of nonylphenol [3]. The hormone activity of E1, a metabolite of E2, is 0.2-0.5 times than that of E2 [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%