2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2193176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between empirical and physically based models of atmospheric correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scarcity of dense vegetation in semiarid Mediterranean territories jeopardizes the effectiveness of this method and explains the poor performance in accuracy and separability for almost every class. Although we verified a good performance for impermeable surfaces, as was found in [14], our results for bare soil were much worse than theirs. This may be due to the existence of sparse vegetation, the diversity of mineral composition or the colour of the bedrock over bare soil surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The scarcity of dense vegetation in semiarid Mediterranean territories jeopardizes the effectiveness of this method and explains the poor performance in accuracy and separability for almost every class. Although we verified a good performance for impermeable surfaces, as was found in [14], our results for bare soil were much worse than theirs. This may be due to the existence of sparse vegetation, the diversity of mineral composition or the colour of the bedrock over bare soil surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Spectral signatures corrected with DOS were very similar to the uncorrected one, as in [14,19]. Image-based methods rely ultimately on the subtraction of dark dense vegetation (DDV) pixels from TOA data, so the shape of spectral signatures may no differ from data without correction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key question then here is: can DOS correction identify some facies better than others? Mandanici et al [29] compared the QUAC, FLAASH, DOS, Empirical Line, and 6S methods and found that a single most accurate method could not be identified. Moreover, in their results, the methods performed variably across different classification methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%