2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
280
1
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
280
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and Multislice CT (MSCT) scanners for dental and maxillofacial applications, effective dose values ranged from 13 to 82 lSv for CBCT and from 474 to 1160 lSv for MSCT [5]. Similar data concerning a significant decrease in radiation dose values have been reported elsewhere [4,6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and Multislice CT (MSCT) scanners for dental and maxillofacial applications, effective dose values ranged from 13 to 82 lSv for CBCT and from 474 to 1160 lSv for MSCT [5]. Similar data concerning a significant decrease in radiation dose values have been reported elsewhere [4,6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It is likely that the strongest aspects of CBCT, i.e. the high isotropic spatial resolution reaching 100 lm or less, the relative lowradiation dose requirements and fewer metal artefacts are characteristics that have made it particularly attractive as a valuable diagnostic technique [5][6][7]. In the head and neck region, where the vascular and bony structural anatomy is particularly complex, the ability to discriminate fine anatomic detail can provide a much more effective clinical tool [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been shown that dental trauma and developmental anomalies can be better assessed in 3 dimensions (16,(30)(31)(32). Nevertheless, CBCT imaging has its own limitation; the effective radiation dose delivered by CBCT devices available in the market varies enormously from around 10-1200 mSv (which is an equivalent of 2-240 panoramic radiographs) (33,34). Therefore, a proper balance (optimization) between, on the one hand, costs and radiation dose and, on the other hand, information required needs to be maintained (16).…”
Section: Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 With the advent of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dentistry, teeth and supporting bone can be evaluated with a low dose of radiation as compared to other diagnostic medical imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) scanning. 10 The CBCT images allow clinicians to evaluate the size of the alveolar bones without the disadvantages of conventional radiographs, as these images give accurate measurements as a result of the high clarity, with the possibility of extracting cephalogram images with accuracy and reliability. [11][12][13] Several studies in the orthodontic literature have focused on the relationship between the thickness of anterior alveolus and the labiolingual position of upper and lower incisors; the relationship between different skeletal jaw positions and anterior alveolar thickness has also been evaluated.…”
Section: Jcdpmentioning
confidence: 99%