2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 7 , 19 , 20 ] In addition, there were also significant difference in early imaging time of some studies, and the early imaging time and delayed time of different studies might overlap. [ 21 , 22 ] The difference of imaging time might be the main reasons for the inconsistent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 , 19 , 20 ] In addition, there were also significant difference in early imaging time of some studies, and the early imaging time and delayed time of different studies might overlap. [ 21 , 22 ] The difference of imaging time might be the main reasons for the inconsistent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of dynamic imaging to assess temporal changes in FDG uptake has several clinical advantages over static imaging. Continuous assessment of changes in FDG uptake, even over short periods of time, can help distinguish pathological uptake, particularly in the abdominal region [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some studies have reported [16,17] that the visual evaluation of changes in the shape and distribution of 18 F-FDG uptake on 4-phase WBD-PET images enabled discrimination between pathological and physiological uptake in the abdominal region, and had higher diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 97%; speci city, 76%; and accuracy, 68%) than DTP-PET [17]. The diagnostic performance of WBD-PET images in this study was comparable to the sensitivity of previous studies that visually evaluate changes in the distribution and shape of 18 F-FDG uptake on WBD-PET images; however, the speci city and accuracy were higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WBD-PET imaging, a short-term Whole-body PET scan repeatedly, can detect dynamic PET images with multi-phase information in only one scanning and can obtain conventional early PET (early) images by summation of multiple phases of dynamic PET images. Using WBD-PET to visually evaluate changes in the distribution and shape of 18 F-FDG uptake, WBD-PET images were found to have higher diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 95% and 97%; speci city, 61% and 76%; and accuracy, 84% and 68%, respectively) than early images alone [16] or DTP-PET [17] in abdominal region. However, visual evaluation of distribution and shape changes in 18 F-FDG uptake is expected to cause discrepancies in judgment among evaluators and depend on the reading skills of the diagnostician, and therefore, more objective index should be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%