2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 in the light of quenching factors

Abstract: There is a long standing debate about whether or not the annual modulation signal reported by the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration is induced by Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMP) in the galaxy's dark matter halo scattering from nuclides in their NaI(Tl) crystal target/detector. This is because regions of WIMP-mass vs. WIMP-nucleon crosssection parameter space that can accommodate the DAMA/LIBRA-phase1 modulation signal in the context of the standard WIMP dark matter galactic halo and isospin-conserving (cano… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though tremendous efforts to search for evidence of WIMP dark matter by directly detecting nuclei recoiling from WIMP-nucleus interactions are being pursued, no definitive signal has been observed [6,7]. One exception is the DAMA experiment that, using an array of NaI(Tl) detectors [8,9], observes an annual modulation of event rates that can be interpreted as resulting from WIMP-nuclei interactions [10,11]. However, this result has been the subject of a continuing debate because the WIMP-nucleon cross sections inferred from the DAMA modulation are in conflict with limits from other experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though tremendous efforts to search for evidence of WIMP dark matter by directly detecting nuclei recoiling from WIMP-nucleus interactions are being pursued, no definitive signal has been observed [6,7]. One exception is the DAMA experiment that, using an array of NaI(Tl) detectors [8,9], observes an annual modulation of event rates that can be interpreted as resulting from WIMP-nuclei interactions [10,11]. However, this result has been the subject of a continuing debate because the WIMP-nucleon cross sections inferred from the DAMA modulation are in conflict with limits from other experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upgraded DAMA/LIBRA detector confirmed the earlier result of DAMA/NaI, collecting more data and reaching a significance of about 13 σ (loosely speaking) for the cumulative exposure [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The ANAIS [7][8][9] and COSINE [10][11][12] experiments employ NaI crystals like DAMA, and are also looking for an annual modulation in the counting rate. So far they have not reported any modulation, but their sensitivity is not yet sufficient to probe the DAMA signal [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The ANAIS [7][8][9] and COSINE [10][11][12] experiments employ NaI crystals like DAMA, and are also looking for an annual modulation in the counting rate. So far they have not reported any modulation, but their sensitivity is not yet sufficient to probe the DAMA signal [12,13]. Furthermore, a DM signal compatible with the DAMA result has not been confirmed by other experiments which use different detectors and techniques (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At any rate, several projects (COSINE-100 [106], ANAIS [107], SABRE [108]) are repeating DAMA's measurement using similar NaI detectors to shed further light on this anomaly. Recent results from COSINE-100 experiment provide evidence that the nuclear recoil quenching factors (critical for calibrating the energy scale of NRs) that DAMA/Libra has been using are incorrect at low energies [109]. Correcting for this effect, they are able to exclude the DAMA/Libra detection with 90% confidence.…”
Section: Bubble Chambers Like Pico and Superheated Droplet Detectors mentioning
confidence: 99%