2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-010-0866-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between cold water immersion therapy (CWIT) and light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) in short-term skeletal muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise in athletes—preliminary results

Abstract: In the last years, phototherapy has becoming a promising tool to improve skeletal muscle recovery after exercise, however, it was not compared with other modalities commonly used with this aim. In the present study we compared the short-term effects of cold water immersion therapy (CWIT) and light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) with placebo LEDT on biochemical markers related to skeletal muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial was performed wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
77
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of low-level laser (light) therapy on muscle tissue when applied before or after intense exercise are mainly related to the prevention of exercise-induced damage, promotion of faster muscle recovery, and also producing increases in performance [10,30,11]. The use of LLLT to prevent muscle damage has been widely investigated in experimental models [15][16][17][18][19][20] and in clinical trials [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Experimental studies have used animal models to induce muscle damage, and clinical trials have used protocols of exercise in isokinetic dynamometers, fitness machines, or free weight lifting to induce muscle damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effects of low-level laser (light) therapy on muscle tissue when applied before or after intense exercise are mainly related to the prevention of exercise-induced damage, promotion of faster muscle recovery, and also producing increases in performance [10,30,11]. The use of LLLT to prevent muscle damage has been widely investigated in experimental models [15][16][17][18][19][20] and in clinical trials [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Experimental studies have used animal models to induce muscle damage, and clinical trials have used protocols of exercise in isokinetic dynamometers, fitness machines, or free weight lifting to induce muscle damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light doses (Joules, J) used in previous studies were between 1 and 6 J delivered per diode laser, totaling 4 J [21] or 60 J [22] delivered to the biceps brachii; 30 and 40 J [23] or 180 J [24] delivered to the quadriceps femoris muscles. When the light source was LED, these studies used a cluster of 69 LEDs and applied 0.3 or 0.9 J per LED, totaling 41.7 J per site of irradiation and a total dose of 41.7 J delivered on biceps brachii [25]; 83.4 J [26] or 125.1 J [27] or 208.5 J [28] delivered to quadriceps femoris muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinically, researchers have disputed over the possible loss of coherency when subjecting laser light to human tissues and recently have shown positive outcomes when using lightemitting diodes (LEDs) (non-coherent light sources) in experimental muscle injury [84,85].…”
Section: Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta energía láser es absorbida y estimula las moléculas y los átomos de las células, sin llegar a causar un aumento rápido de la temperatura del tejido donde se aplica 5 . La terapia láser de baja potencia se usa en clínica como un coadyudante en el tratamiento del dolor, por su efecto antiinflamatorio, y para acelerar el proceso de curación de diversas patologías musculares 6,7 ,quemaduras 8 , heridas postquirúrgicas 9,10 , y úlceras crónicas 11 . El láser como terapia para la cicatrización de heridas se usa desde 1960, pero a pesar de llevar tanto tiempo en uso, sus resultados siguen siendo controvertidos.…”
Section: Terapéutica Podológicaunclassified