2023
DOI: 10.24857/rgsa.v16n3-015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Classification Algorithms: Gaussian Mixture Model - GMM and Random Forest - RF, for Landsat 8 Images

Abstract: Purpose: Given the importance of monitoring and managing land cover, especially in countries with continental proportions, such as Brazil. This research aimed to compare two remote sensing image classifier algorithms.   Method/design/approach: The article compared the Gaussian Mixture Model and Random Forest classification algorithms, using Landsat 8 image, which was classified in a supervised way, in the Dezetsaka plugin of QGIS. The analysis of the performance of each model was performed using th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is advisable to undergo network training for improvement in efficiency and greater spatial accuracy of plant species. Corroborating our findings, Pantoja et al [52] compared the Random Forest algorithm with GMM, indicating that Random Forest outperformed with the following Kappa index: Random Forest (K = 0.94) and Gaussian Mixture Model (K = 0.85).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, it is advisable to undergo network training for improvement in efficiency and greater spatial accuracy of plant species. Corroborating our findings, Pantoja et al [52] compared the Random Forest algorithm with GMM, indicating that Random Forest outperformed with the following Kappa index: Random Forest (K = 0.94) and Gaussian Mixture Model (K = 0.85).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%