2018
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1402593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in strength is due to the ability of the alkaline activator to dissolve some of the silica and alumina present in the soil for geopolymerization to occur and also due to the pozzolanic reaction of geopolymer in lateritic soil. Similar assertion was made by Teerawattanasuk & Voottipruex. (2018) in their study of Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material.…”
Section: Unconfined Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The increase in strength is due to the ability of the alkaline activator to dissolve some of the silica and alumina present in the soil for geopolymerization to occur and also due to the pozzolanic reaction of geopolymer in lateritic soil. Similar assertion was made by Teerawattanasuk & Voottipruex. (2018) in their study of Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material.…”
Section: Unconfined Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, additional research is necessary to determine the possibility of employing GGBFS and fly ash as soil stabilizers in increasing soil compression strength and shortening the curing time in order to maximize soil power. Geopolymers have recently been shown to be an effective replacement to Portland cement for reinforcing degraded soils; hence, geopolymers can be pushed for their suitability for use as a concrete substitute [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Soil Stabilization By Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturing of conventional soil stabilizers such as cement and lime results in considerable CO 2 and energy emissions [ 47 , 48 , 49 ]. Therefore, civil engineering firms are continuously on the search for the new soil stabilizer, a low-carbon, sustainable substance, to be employed to replace cement as a soil stabilizer [ 47 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. Geopolymerization is the process of polymerizing inorganic natural materials to form geopolymers [ 43 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CBR value for unsoaked conditions increases due to mixes offering more resistance due to better packing of different sized fractions. Further, for curing samples rapid improvement in the CBR value has been observed this can be attributed to the less attraction of water during the curing process as a result of the dense microstructure of soil particles due to gel formation [17,19,39,40].…”
Section: California Bearing Ratio (Cbr) and Resilient Modulus (Mr)mentioning
confidence: 95%