2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2007.10.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Ce and Yb heavy fermion compounds: versus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is the stronger localization of the 4f shell in Yb than in Ce and the other is the substantially stronger spin-orbit coupling of Yb than Ce. 48 Our present results are consistent with these observations, as they suggest that a slow crossover from Fermi liquid to magnetically ordered state occurs for both Yb compounds. The pressure dependence of the valence has not been reported yet for CeNi 2 Ge 2 and CePd 2 Si 2 , but we believe that the comparison with the Yb122 systems will be interesting because of the analogy with the relation between CeRh 2 Si 2 and YbRh 2 Si 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is the stronger localization of the 4f shell in Yb than in Ce and the other is the substantially stronger spin-orbit coupling of Yb than Ce. 48 Our present results are consistent with these observations, as they suggest that a slow crossover from Fermi liquid to magnetically ordered state occurs for both Yb compounds. The pressure dependence of the valence has not been reported yet for CeNi 2 Ge 2 and CePd 2 Si 2 , but we believe that the comparison with the Yb122 systems will be interesting because of the analogy with the relation between CeRh 2 Si 2 and YbRh 2 Si 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, in CeRh 2 Si 2 the transition from AFM order to a paramagnetic ͑PM͒ state is believed to be first order with a volume discontinuity. 48 On the other hand, YbRh 2 Si 2 shows a continuous change from AFM to PM under pressure. 49 This difference in the pressure dependence between these systems has been explained by two kinds of scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,38,39 The superconducting T c reaches a maximum at p c with T c ≈ 0.42 K. 40 It should be noted that antiferromagnetism vanishes in a first order phase transition at p c as recently proven by clear volume discontinuities in thermal expansion measurements under pressure around p c . 41,42 Moreover, at the magnetic instability Fermi-liquid behavior is observed. For instance, the electrical resistivity displays Fermiliquid behavior even around p c with a ∆ρ = AT 2 temperature very large values of this ratio [3].…”
Section: Superconductivity Near First Order Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…39 However, the A coefficient of the electrical resistivity shows a pronounced maximum at the critical pressure p c . 40,42 At the same time, the temperature-independent specific heat coefficient γ rises steeply from ambient pressure, where the mass enhancement is small (γ = 23 mJ/molK 2 ) up to p c where γ ≈ 80 J/molK 2 is found (cf. Fig.…”
Section: Superconductivity Near First Order Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the energy scales, e.g. characteristic pressures, temperatures, and magnetic fields, are quite different as discussed in the the case of YbRh 2 Si 2 and CeRh 2 Si 2 [5,6]. Recently, important differences between two systems have been pointed out: the hierarchy of the significant energy scales, the band width of the 4 f -electron and the strength of the spin-orbit splitting, resulting in the noticeable different variations of their valence in a real lattice , i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%