Comparison between calculations with the AMD code and experimental data for peripheral collisions of 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Nb</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.16em" /><mml:mn>93</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>Nb</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>116</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>Sn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>
 at 38

Piantelli, S.; Olmi, A.; Maurenzig, P. R.; Ono, Akira; Bini, M.; Casini, G.; Pasquali, G.; Mangiarotti, A.; Poggi, G.; Stefanini, A. A.; Barlini, S.; Camaiani, A.; Ciampi, C.; Frosin, C.; Ottanelli, P.; Valdré, S.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.064616

Cited by 18 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…C b is well correlated to the impact parameter, as shown in Fig. 2 of [6], at least in the range 5 fm -grazing impact parameter. Below 5 fm C b loses its reliability as impact parameter estimator because of the increasing weight of ternary events, coming from QP/QT fissions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 57%

“…5 of [6], the simulation is able to well reproduce the behaviour of the center of mass polar angle of the QP as a function of the centrality (Wilczynski plot) both in terms of average values and of standard deviation of the distribution. All the tested configurations (afterburner, switching time, y parameter) are summarized in table II of [6] with a quality factor indicating the degree of agreement between experimental data and simulation (0 means perfect reproduction of the experimental data). All the tested configurations of the parameters give a satisfactory reproduction of the experimental data.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…6 of [6], at least in terms of average value; for the standard deviation, on the contrary, there are some systematic differences. The use of GEMINI Fortran90 clearly improves the quality of the agreement; concerning the switching time, no significant improvement is obtained for times longer than 500 fm/c, while it seems important to prolong the calculation beyond 200 fm/c, as summarized in table III of [6].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…AMD (Antisymmetrized Molecular Dynamics [1]) is a QMD model which proved its reliability in the description of central reactions [4,5]. It is therefore interesting to compare its predictions with experimental results concerning peripheral collisions, as done in [6] for the systems 93 Nb+ 93,116 Sn at 38 MeV/nucleon on data collected with the FIASCO setup [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Details on the used version of the AMD model can be found in [6]. Here we only recall that the main free pa-rameter of the model is the in-medium nucleon-nucleon cross section σ = yρ 2 3 tanh σ f ree yρ −2/3 , ruled by the y parameter, whose standard value is y = 0.85.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Lights and (some) shadows in the comparison among experimental data of heavy ion collisionat Fermi energies and the dynamical model AMD

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The simulation of heavy ion collisions in the Fermi energy region is a challenge for the theoretical models; in particular it is difficult to obtain a coherent description in all the impact parameter range and to reproduce all the experimental observables. In this contribution we will show the very good job done by the dynamical model AMD [1] followed by the statistical code GEMINI [2, 3] as an afterburner. The model is able to reproduce the main characteristics of peripheral and semiperipheral collisions, although some discrepancies still persist.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 80%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Lights and (some) shadows in the comparison among experimental data of heavy ion collisionat Fermi energies and the dynamical model AMD

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Dynamical fission of the quasiprojectile and isospin equilibration for the system Kr80+Ca48 at 35 MeV/nucleon

Piantelli¹,

Casini²,

Ono³

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experimental results concerning the dynamical fission of quasiprojectiles in semiperipheral collisions for the system 80 Kr+ 48 Ca at 35 MeV/nucleon are presented. Data have been collected with four blocks of the FAZIA setup in the first physics experiment of the FAZIA Collaboration. The degree of isospin equilibration between the two fission fragments and its dependence on their charge asymmetry is investigated. The data are compared with the results of the AMD model coupled to GEMINI as an afterburner, in order to get hints about the timescale of the process.

show abstract

Influence of fast emissions and statistical de-excitation on the isospin transport ratio

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison between calculations with the AMD code and experimental data for peripheral collisions of Nb93+93Nb,116Sn at 38

Cited by 18 publications

References 52 publications

Lights and (some) shadows in the comparison among experimental data of heavy ion collisionat Fermi energies and the dynamical model AMD

Lights and (some) shadows in the comparison among experimental data of heavy ion collisionat Fermi energies and the dynamical model AMD

Dynamical fission of the quasiprojectile and isospin equilibration for the system Kr80+Ca48 at 35 MeV/nucleon

Influence of fast emissions and statistical de-excitation on the isospin transport ratio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About