2004
DOI: 10.1299/jsmemp.2004.12.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between brazing properties of stainless steel to various aluminium alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though it is not easy to observe from this photograph, no marks of the brazing filler metal to have adhered on the stainless steel surface was observed, despite that the discoloration at several parts was seen on the surface of stainless steel. On the contrary, on the surface of the aluminum alloy, the traces of the reaction between the brazing filler metal and the base metal, and those of the absorption of the brazing filler metal into the base metal are observed (6) . Table 5 shows the results of EDX analysis on the brazing filler metal layer of the SUS304/A1050 joint formed at the brazing temperature of 888 K for 30 s. It also shows the results on the surface of the A2024 side of SUS304/A2024 assembly which was failed to join at the brazing temperature of 888 K for 30 s. In the result of the SUS304/A1050 joint, Si and Zn are detected besides the constituent elements which had diffused from both of the aluminum alloy side and the stainless steel side into the joint interface layer.…”
Section: Macroscopic Observationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Though it is not easy to observe from this photograph, no marks of the brazing filler metal to have adhered on the stainless steel surface was observed, despite that the discoloration at several parts was seen on the surface of stainless steel. On the contrary, on the surface of the aluminum alloy, the traces of the reaction between the brazing filler metal and the base metal, and those of the absorption of the brazing filler metal into the base metal are observed (6) . Table 5 shows the results of EDX analysis on the brazing filler metal layer of the SUS304/A1050 joint formed at the brazing temperature of 888 K for 30 s. It also shows the results on the surface of the A2024 side of SUS304/A2024 assembly which was failed to join at the brazing temperature of 888 K for 30 s. In the result of the SUS304/A1050 joint, Si and Zn are detected besides the constituent elements which had diffused from both of the aluminum alloy side and the stainless steel side into the joint interface layer.…”
Section: Macroscopic Observationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At the brazing temperature of 868 K, the brazing joints of A1050, A2024 and A6061 to stainless steel were formed. When the brazing temperature was raised step by step to 898 K, though the good joint was obtained at every temperature for A1050, the temperature range to form the brazed joint was not simple for other aluminum alloys (6) . During the brazing process in air, the lack of flux is always concerned.…”
Section: Influence Of the Amount Of Supplied Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations