Comparison Between Banded and Nonbanded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-Year Follow-Up: a Preliminary Retrospective Analysis

Bhandari, Mohit; Bhandari, Shilpa; Mishra, Arun Kumar; Mathur, Winni; Dixit, Atul

doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1929-7

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…. Among the articles in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus that were retrieved, eight comparative studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The level of agreement between the two reviewers was “good” (κ = 0.635; 95% CI: 0.413, 0.857).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The level of agreement between the two reviewers was “good” (κ = 0.635; 95% CI: 0.413, 0.857). The study design was retrospective in three , prospective in two studies and randomized controlled in three studies . The studies included were conducted in Chile , United States , India , Belgium , Brazil , Mexico and were published between 2007 and 2017.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…S1. The mean operative time was assessed by only one study . According to its outcomes, mean operative time was significantly greater in the BRYGB group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, the incidence of vomiting (OR: 1.66 [95% CI: 0.60, 4.62]; P = 0.33) along with the incidence of other complications (OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.33, 1.35]; P = 0.26) were similar between the patients treated with either BRYGB or NBRYGB. Furthermore, the incidence of band erosion ranged from 0% to 7.7% . The rate of band removal ranged from 0% to 1.5% .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…S1. The mean operative time was assessed by only one study . According to its outcomes, mean operative time was significantly greater in the BRYGB group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many factors are probably responsible for the poor outcome after SG, including initial BMI, changes in dietary habits, and sleeve dilation (28)(29)(30). For these reasons, some authors have described implantation of a band or ring around the proximal sleeve pouch to improve weight loss and maintenance as in the BRYGB procedure (31)(32)(33)(34)(35). In our study, the BSG group showed a significant difference compared with the rest reported %EBWL of 66.74% and %TBWL of 38.2% after BSG, which were significantly greater than those in the SG patients in their study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgery in Patients with Super Obesity: Medium‐Term Follow‐Up Outcomes at a High‐Volume Center

Bhandari¹,

Leon-Ballesteros²,

Kosta³

et al. 2019

Obesity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective There is a need to determine which bariatric operations are the most effective for patients with super obesity and super‐super obesity. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with super obesity and super‐super obesity at Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics Surgery Center in Indore, India. Results Five hundred fourteen patients with super obesity and super‐super obesity had surgery at our center from January 2010 through December 2013. The baseline characteristics were different in different operations. The initial average age, weight, and BMI were 44.4 (SD 11.9) years, 145.4 (SD 24.2) kg, and 55.48 (SD 5.32) kg/m2, respectively. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (227 [44.2%]) was the most common procedure, followed by one‐anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (124 [24.1%]), Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (102 [19.8%]), banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG) (33 [6.4%]), and banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (BRYGB) (28 [5.4%]). After 3 years, the percentages of excess body weight loss (%EBWL) for SG, OAGB, RYGB, BSG, and BRYGB were 62.38%, 78.59%, 69.55%, 85.11%, and 75.77% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Failure to achieve BMI < 35 kg/m2 was more frequent in the group who underwent SG (67.9%), followed by RYGB (29.16%), BRYGB (22.2%), OAGB (9.87%), and none in the BSG group. Conclusions BSG, OAGB, and BRYGB have very good to excellent midterm outcomes for patients with super obesity and super‐super obesity, whereas RYGB and SG have average outcomes at 3 years. There is a need for multicenter, long‐term, and prospective studies to be performed to confirm these findings.

show abstract

Banded Sleeves

Bhandari¹

2021

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison Between Banded and Nonbanded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-Year Follow-Up: a Preliminary Retrospective Analysis

Abstract: The patients with banded gastric bypass had significantly better results in terms of weight loss, weight stability and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores at 2 years.

Cited by 13 publications

References 17 publications

Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Surgery in Patients with Super Obesity: Medium‐Term Follow‐Up Outcomes at a High‐Volume Center

Banded Sleeves

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About