2003
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200201-022oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between Automatic and Fixed Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in the Home

Abstract: We tested the hypothesis that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use and outcomes can be improved by an autotitrating CPAP device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) who require higher CPAP (10 cm H2O or more). In this multisite randomized single-blind cross-over study, 44 patients (mean age, 49 +/- 10 years) were randomized to 6 weeks at laboratory-determined fixed pressure and 6 weeks on autotitrating CPAP. Average nightly use was greater in automatic mode (306 versus 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
4
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
89
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this group of patients, sleepiness scores were better on APAP than on CPAP. In a trial of patients requiring higher pressures, APAP resulted in a greater than 30 min per night improvement in adherence and lower average pressure than with fixed CPAP, with better self-reported sleep quality scores [18,20]. These findings suggest that while there may be minimal differences between CPAP and APAP for unselected patients, there may be groups of patients who may do better on APAP, including those with significant pressure variability, or those who require high therapeutic pressures.…”
Section: Apap As Treatment For Osamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this group of patients, sleepiness scores were better on APAP than on CPAP. In a trial of patients requiring higher pressures, APAP resulted in a greater than 30 min per night improvement in adherence and lower average pressure than with fixed CPAP, with better self-reported sleep quality scores [18,20]. These findings suggest that while there may be minimal differences between CPAP and APAP for unselected patients, there may be groups of patients who may do better on APAP, including those with significant pressure variability, or those who require high therapeutic pressures.…”
Section: Apap As Treatment For Osamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most studies have shown only small differences in adherence between fixed CPAP and APAP. Early, small studies suggested that APAP may have advantages over CPAP in terms of adherence [18,19]. A more recent randomized 6-week trial in almost 200 unselected patients showed a more modest difference in adherence of 0.2 h per night (12 min) and a small difference in sleepiness between APAP and CPAP [20].…”
Section: Apap As Treatment For Osamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autotitrating CPAP devices automatically adjust the level of delivered pressure that is required to ensure upper airway patency. 24 Device usage was covertly monitored as 'time at pressure' and downloaded weekly.…”
Section: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massie et al (30) found that during APAP, patients reported more restful sleep, better quality sleep, less discomfort from pressure and less trouble getting to sleep. Randerath et al (31) reported that 75% of responders preferred APAP.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%