1988
DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(88)90044-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between atmospheric turbidity coefficients of desert and temperate climates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this measurement, a pyrheliometer equipped with sun follower is required. In spite of the diversity of the T L computation methods using solar data, our results are comparable to those founded in similar regions by other authors cited in the literature [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For this measurement, a pyrheliometer equipped with sun follower is required. In spite of the diversity of the T L computation methods using solar data, our results are comparable to those founded in similar regions by other authors cited in the literature [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The procedures for calculating these two parameters will not be discussed here. Abdelrahman et al (1988) found that the two parameters are approximately linearly related to each other.…”
Section: B Atmospheric Turbiditymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The Angstrdrm turbidity coefficient for Dhahran was approximately ten times that for Davos, Switzerland, and twice that for Los Angeles. Abdelrahman et al (1988) compared the Linke turbidity factors for Dhahran and Avignon, France. They found that the ratio of the Linke factor at Dhahran to that at Avignon averaged 1.6 during the warmer months and 1.8 for October through March.…”
Section: B Atmospheric Turbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter version is used here. To overcome the difficulty in using T L while respecting the model's intentional simplicity, a simple linear function of β has been used, T L = 2.1331 + 19.0204 β (20.11) where the numerical coefficients have been obtained by combining the empirical determinations of β = f(T L ) proposed by different authors (Abdelrahman et al 1988;Grenier et al 1994;Hinzpeter 1950;Katz et al 1982). …”
Section: Model Performance Benchmarking and Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%