2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/814/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between a typical and a simplified model for blast load-induced structural response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the results are compared to those of Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud [24] for numerical system parameters in terms of mass, m = 25 ×10 3 As illustrated in Fig. 5, the present exact solutions of the dynamic response of SDOF system in terms of displacement, velocity, and acceleration time histories under blast loads is consistent with the solution proposed by Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud [24].…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the results are compared to those of Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud [24] for numerical system parameters in terms of mass, m = 25 ×10 3 As illustrated in Fig. 5, the present exact solutions of the dynamic response of SDOF system in terms of displacement, velocity, and acceleration time histories under blast loads is consistent with the solution proposed by Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud [24].…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The results obtained from the current study have been modified by neglecting the magnitude of harmonic load generated by the machine and considering the blast load to take place at time t1 = 0. Validation employing study by Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud[24] for (a) displacement, (b) velocity, and (3) acceleration responses of the SDOF system under the given blast load.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation employing study by Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud 26 for (a) displacement, (b) velocity, and (c) acceleration responses of the SDOF system under the given blast load.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the results are compared to those of Abd-Elhamed and Mahmoud 26 for numerical system parameters in terms of mass, m = 25 × 10 3 kg, fundamental time period, Tnormaln = 1.2 s, damping ratio, ξ = 5%, peak pressure of explosive load, F0=312 kpa, exposed surface area Aeq = 5.61 m 2 , shape parameter, b = 1.701 and duration of the blast, tnormald = 0.02142 s. The results obtained from the current study have been modified by neglecting the magnitude of harmonic load generated by the machine and considering the blast load to take place at time t 1 = 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation