Comparison between a time-domain and a frequency-domain system for optical tomography

Abstract

The quality of phase and amplitude data from two medical optical tomography systems were compared. The two systems are a 32-channel time-domain system developed at University College London (UCL) and a 16-channel frequency-domain system developed at Helsinki University of Technology (HUT). Difference data measured from an inhomogeneous and a homogeneous phantom were compared with a finite-element method (diffusion equation) and images of scattering and absorption were reconstructed based on it. The measurements were performed at measurement times between 1 and 30 s per source. The mean rms errors in the data measured by the HUT system were 3.4% for amplitude and 0.51 deg for phase, while the corresponding values for the UCL data were 6.0% and 0.46 deg, respectively. The reproducibility of the data measured with the two systems was tested with a measurement time of 5 s per source. It was 0.4% in amplitude for the HUT system and 4% for the UCL system, and 0.08 deg in phase for both systems. The image quality of the reconstructions from the data measured with the two systems were compared with several quantitative criteria. In general a higher contrast was observed in the images calculated from the HUT data.

Optical imaging of infants' neurocognitive development: Recent advances and perspectives

“…Such systems do not rely on photon counting, and therefore offer greater SNR and dynamic range than time-domain methods. However, they provide less equivalent temporal information unless multiple frequencies are employed, and operate less efficiently at very low intensities (Nissilä et al, 2006). Optical topography systems have been built based on both time-domain (Quaresima et al, 2005) and frequency-domain (Danen et al, 1998;Choi et al, 2004;Kotilahti et al, 2005) technologies.…”

Mono- and multimodal registration of optical breast images

“…Because the acquisition is band-limited to the range of 50 to 500 MHz, less information is obtained with an FD acquisition than with a TD acquisition. 48,49 The simplicity of the CW approach makes it the lowest cost data to acquire, but the inability to distinguish between scattering and absorption makes reconstruction of high quality images complicated. The measurement type used in the acquisition, therefore, has a strong impact on the ability to resolve structures in the images.…”

Advanced Optical Methods for Functional Brain Imaging: Time‐Domain Functional Near‐Infrared Spectroscopy

“…Moreover, an FD signal at one frequency is one Fourier mode in the Fourier transform of a TD signal. A comparison of the TD and FD methods has been reported by Nissilä et al for a specific tomographic setup [23]. A more general comparison is difficult, however, and eventually depends on many factors in a particular experimental arrangement (both hardware and software) [24].…”