1996
DOI: 10.1097/00042192-199603030-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between a New Ultrasound Densitometer and Single-Photon Absorptiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of our AD-SoS values with those given by other authors provides further interesting information. For example, in 55-year-old women Murgia et al [17] observed an AD-SoS value of 2007 ± 74 m/s, while in our study it was 1942 ± 72 m/s. In 60-year-old women Sili Scavalli et al [19] reported 1962 ± 71 m/s, Aguado et al [18] 2006 ± 68 m/s, and in our study it was only 1903 ± 84 m/s.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of our AD-SoS values with those given by other authors provides further interesting information. For example, in 55-year-old women Murgia et al [17] observed an AD-SoS value of 2007 ± 74 m/s, while in our study it was 1942 ± 72 m/s. In 60-year-old women Sili Scavalli et al [19] reported 1962 ± 71 m/s, Aguado et al [18] 2006 ± 68 m/s, and in our study it was only 1903 ± 84 m/s.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…2). No such findings have been reported by other authors [15][16][17]. The correlation coefficient between AD-SoS and age in Polish postmenopausal women was -0.58 (p <0.0001), similar to that given by Sili Scavalli et al [19] r = -0.63 and higher than the value obtained by Duboeuf et al [16] r = -0.39.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations