2017
DOI: 10.5194/asr-14-271-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between 3D-Var and 4D-Var data assimilation methods for the simulation of a heavy rainfall case in central Italy

Abstract: Abstract. This work aims to provide a comparison between three dimensional and four dimensional variational data assimilation methods (3D-Var and 4D-Var) for a heavy rainfall case in central Italy. To evaluate the impact of the assimilation of reflectivity and radial velocity acquired from Monte Midia Doppler radar into the Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model, the quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) is used.The two methods are compared for a heavy rainfall event that occurred in central Italy on 14 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3D-Var scheme iteratively minimizes the cost function that depends on error covariance matrices. The observations are collected at analysis time with no model integration required, therefore the analysis increment does not evolve in time [20,21]. Of the widely used data assimilation schemes, the 3D-Var scheme is the most computationally efficient [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D-Var scheme iteratively minimizes the cost function that depends on error covariance matrices. The observations are collected at analysis time with no model integration required, therefore the analysis increment does not evolve in time [20,21]. Of the widely used data assimilation schemes, the 3D-Var scheme is the most computationally efficient [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the two implementations is that the observations in 4D-var/WRF model are integrated within an assimilation window at the exact time of the observations. Consequently, greater computing resources compared to 3D-var assimilation are necessary [50]. Taking the possible application of GNSS ZTD data assimilation in NOA's operational forecasting system into account, without significantly altering the timeliness of forecast delivery, the 3D-var option was employed in the present work.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D-VDA method collects observations during analysis time and does not require model integration. Therefore, the analysis increment does not evolve over time and requires less computing resources [61]. While, in the 4D-VDA method, all the observations in the assimilation period are incorporated into the model.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%