“…For the scale evaluation process, we chose to rate the quality of evidence related to the AERA/APA/NCME domains (content/validity/reliability/internal structure) in Likerttype scale. The instruments were rated on a 10 point-scale, punctuating-regardless of the number of studies-if they Rolfs, & Pucell (2007) Nursing students and faculty teachers 4 Cole, Reece, & Lindeman (2005) Health students 5; 10 Span & Vidal (2003) Undergraduate students 3; 4 Burt & DeMello (2002) Undergraduate students 5; 7 Sakalli (2002) Turkish undergraduate students 2; 3; 6; 10 Sakalli & Ug urlu (2002) Turkish undergraduate students 2; 3; 7; 8 Guth, Hewitt-Gervais, Smith, & Fisher (2000) Undergraduate and graduate students 9 Lippincott, Wlazelek, & Schumacher (2000) Asian and American undergraduate students 5 Sakalli & Ug urlu (2001) Turkish undergraduate students 2; 3; 8 Schlub & Martsolf (1999) Nurse students 3 Jome & Tokar (1998) Male undergraduate and graduate students 3; 5 Roderick, McCammon, Long, & Allred (1998) Undergraduate students 3; 4 Berkman & Zinberg (1997) Social workers 3; 4 Monroe, Baker, & Rollb (1997) Men (unspecified) 5; 7 Adams, Wright, & Lohr (1996) Heterosexual men 7 Dunkle & Francis (1996) Undergraduate students 3 Hogan & Rentz (1996) Undergraduate students and staff 3 Matchinsky & Iverson (1996) Undergraduate students 3 Riggle, Ellis, & Crawford (1996) College students 7 Pain & Disney (1995) Australian undergraduate students 4; 6; 8; 10 Patel, Long, McCammon, & Wuensch (1995) College students 3 Smith (1993) Psychiatric nurses 5 Hudson & Ricketts (1980) Undergraduate students 1; 2; 3; 5; 6; 8; 10 Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gays Scale presented evidence in each of the domains described in Table 1, with a reservation that in the last two items (i.e., temporal stability and internal consistency) the scales punctuated if they presented studies that showed good evidence (>.70).…”