2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-019-00727-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Selection of Current Implantable Anti-Epileptic Devices

Abstract: Implantable neural stimulators represent an advanced treatment adjunct to medication for pharmacoresistant epilepsy and alternative for patients that are not good candidates for resective surgery. Three treatment modalities are currently FDA-approved: vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, and deep brain stimulation. These devices were originally trialed in very similar patient populations with focal epilepsy, but head-to-head comparison trials have not been performed. As such, device selection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
34
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The external programming system allows healthcare providers to change generator settings in addition to visualizing and downloading data collected by the device over time (3). A detailed review of the surgical implant procedure, magnetic resonance imaging safety and compatibility, programming principles, and real-world clinical evidence that supports the therapy's use can be found elsewhere (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external programming system allows healthcare providers to change generator settings in addition to visualizing and downloading data collected by the device over time (3). A detailed review of the surgical implant procedure, magnetic resonance imaging safety and compatibility, programming principles, and real-world clinical evidence that supports the therapy's use can be found elsewhere (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1994 multiple studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of VNS. The largest studies, E03 (multinational) and E05 (US Centers) were of similar design and followed response in patients with refractory epilepsy, which was described as at least 6 focal onset seizures involving loss of awareness in a 30-day period with no more than 21 days in between [56,59,[61][62][63][64]. They were observed for a 3-month baseline period followed by 3 months post-implantation where participants received high (average 1.3 mA) versus low stimulation (average 1.2mA, less stimulation and pulse frequency) [63].…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was approved in 1997 for patients >12 years of age and was expanded to include patients >4 years of age as of 2017. VNS consists of stimulating electrodes that are coiled around the left vagus nerve in the carotid sheath and implanted subcutaneously in the left anterior chest wall [18,56,57](See Fig. 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been steady progress with these strategies over the decades, many approaches are maturing to the point where they seem poised to provide a workable and effective therapy for a larger number of patients. 70 Indeed, the introduction in 2013 of an FDA-approved closed loop device that detects seizures and aborts them by deep brain stimulation has spawned many efforts to refine stimulation parameters for better seizure control. 71 New seizure prediction algorithms 8 as well as new devices may allow intravenous injection or even direct infusion of antiseizure agents into the brain at the onset of or immediately before a seizure is predicted.…”
Section: Real-time Management Of Seizuresmentioning
confidence: 99%