2022
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-v-4-2022-275-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Evaluation of Different Gis Software Tools to Estimate Solar Irradiation

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, five commonly used software tools to estimate solar radiation in the urban context (GRASS GIS, ArcGIS, SimStadt, CitySim and Ladybug) are run on the same test site and are compared in terms of input data requirements, usability, and accuracy of the results. Spatial and weather data have been collected for an area located in the Brazilian city of São Paulo, in the district of Santana. The test area surrounds a weather station, for which meteorological data of the last 15 years have been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of radiation algorithms applied to surface data are represented in these models primarily through the use of geographic information systems (GIS). GIS tools to determine solar irradiation include tools such as GRASS GIS, ArcGIS, SimStadt, CitySim, and Ladybug (Giannelli, León-Sánchez and Agugiaro, 2022). Ladybug and CitySim are recommended for precise neighborhood-scale solar irradiance assessment due to their comparable accuracy, common features like support for CityGML and GUI, despite Ladybug having a steeper initial learning curve (Giannelli et al, 2022).…”
Section: Solar Irradiance Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of radiation algorithms applied to surface data are represented in these models primarily through the use of geographic information systems (GIS). GIS tools to determine solar irradiation include tools such as GRASS GIS, ArcGIS, SimStadt, CitySim, and Ladybug (Giannelli, León-Sánchez and Agugiaro, 2022). Ladybug and CitySim are recommended for precise neighborhood-scale solar irradiance assessment due to their comparable accuracy, common features like support for CityGML and GUI, despite Ladybug having a steeper initial learning curve (Giannelli et al, 2022).…”
Section: Solar Irradiance Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIS tools to determine solar irradiation include tools such as GRASS GIS, ArcGIS, SimStadt, CitySim, and Ladybug (Giannelli, León-Sánchez and Agugiaro, 2022). Ladybug and CitySim are recommended for precise neighborhood-scale solar irradiance assessment due to their comparable accuracy, common features like support for CityGML and GUI, despite Ladybug having a steeper initial learning curve (Giannelli et al, 2022). Other tools for assessingClick or tap here to enter text.Click or tap here to enter text.…”
Section: Solar Irradiance Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Giannelli et al [75], the GIS-based approach is suitable for large-scale preliminary studies. For more accurate studies, one can suggest Ladybug Tools or CitySim.…”
Section: Software Technologies and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there is almost no difference between studying a full year of 8760 hours or just a single day once the matrix is computed. At the same time, it is unknown when and for how long a face is shaded [75].…”
Section: Generation Of the Cumulative Sky Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• building footprint extraction from point clouds (Wu et al, 2018;Buyukdemircioglu et al, 2022); • 3D building/city model generation (Lafarge and Mallet., 2012;Biljecki et al, 2015;Özdemir and Remondino, 2018); • photovoltaic potential estimation of building roof or other suitable areas (Nex et al, 2013;Giannelli et al, 2022); • urban heat island analysis and forecasting (Voelkel and Shandas, 2017;Bosch et al, 2021;Ellena et al, 2023); • urban tree mapping using hyperspectral and LiDAR data fusion (Dalponte et al, 2013;Ballanti et al, 2020); • derivation of urban ecological indexes (Darvishzadeh et al, 2009;Heiden et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Usage Dataset and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%