2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

 Comparison and evaluation of Abbott chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and ChIVD light‐initiated chemiluminescent assay in the detection of Treponema pallidum antibody

Abstract: Background Laboratory tests play an important role in the diagnosis of syphilis. This study aimed to compare and assess the performance of the Abbott chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) and the ChIVD light‐initiated chemiluminescent assay (LICA) in the detection of Treponema pallidum ( TP ) antibody. Methods A total of 10 498 serum samples were detected with two assays, and the Treponema p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LICA Syphilis TP, a commercial available CIA kit, is highly sensitive and specific and could be used for T. pallidum antibody detection and syphilis screening. 24 Using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the LICA Syphilis TP revealed an overall higher sensitivity (97.6%), especially in early syphilis stage, than the Tp0100‐based ELISA (95.6%) but an overall lower specificity (96.2%) than the Tp0100‐based ELISA (98.1%). The possible explanation for these results is that a combination of multiple treponemal antigens and the total antibody (IgG and IgM) detection in the LICA Syphilis TP may enhance the sensitivity than a single treponemal antigen and IgG antibody detection in the Tp0100‐based ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LICA Syphilis TP, a commercial available CIA kit, is highly sensitive and specific and could be used for T. pallidum antibody detection and syphilis screening. 24 Using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the LICA Syphilis TP revealed an overall higher sensitivity (97.6%), especially in early syphilis stage, than the Tp0100‐based ELISA (95.6%) but an overall lower specificity (96.2%) than the Tp0100‐based ELISA (98.1%). The possible explanation for these results is that a combination of multiple treponemal antigens and the total antibody (IgG and IgM) detection in the LICA Syphilis TP may enhance the sensitivity than a single treponemal antigen and IgG antibody detection in the Tp0100‐based ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…20173401251), which uses double‐antigen sandwich immunoassay method based on recombinant T. pallidum antigens TpN15, TpN17, and TpN47 for qualitative detection of the coresponding both IgG and IgM antibodies. 24 In this study, the LICA Syphilis TP test was performed to screen all the serum samples described above on a fully automated system Chemclin @ 1500 analyzer (ChIVD, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The chemiluminescent reaction was measured in relative light units (RLUs), with the RLU/cutoff (S/CO) radio ≥1.0 indicating a positive result, and the S/CO radio <1 indicating a negative result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays, LICA has been used in many studies, such as detection of hepatitis C virus antibodies [6], total testosterone [7], estradiol [8], human cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies [9], allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies [10], and Treponema pallidum antibodies [11]. Apart from the above, our team had successfully applied LICA to the detection of food allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), such as egg-sIgE [12] and cow's milk-sIgE [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report on the LICA-based detection of inhaled allergen-sIgE till date [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover, the Artemisia pollen is the most widespread outdoor allergen throughout China, which can cause allergic rhinitis, asthma, and/or both [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%