2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and design of interpretable linguistic vs. scatter FRBSs: Gm3m generalization and new rule meaning index for global assessment and local pseudo-linguistic representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, we have those involving semantic issues such as: the distinguishability of the fuzzy sets (Oliveira, 1999), consistence and similarity of the fuzzy rule base (Alonso and Magdalena, 2011;Pulkkinen et al, 2008), the number of rules simultaneously fired (Pancho et al, 2013;Márquez et al, 2012), etc. ; or those defining more complex indexes to obtain some semantic restrictions, such as GM3M (Gacto et al, 2010), RBC (Alonso and Magdalena, 2011), Integrity I (Antonelli et al, 2011), Transparency (Pulkkinen et al, 2008), Cointension (Mencar et al, 2011) or RMI (Galende et al, 2014).…”
Section: Accuracy-interpretability Trade-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, we have those involving semantic issues such as: the distinguishability of the fuzzy sets (Oliveira, 1999), consistence and similarity of the fuzzy rule base (Alonso and Magdalena, 2011;Pulkkinen et al, 2008), the number of rules simultaneously fired (Pancho et al, 2013;Márquez et al, 2012), etc. ; or those defining more complex indexes to obtain some semantic restrictions, such as GM3M (Gacto et al, 2010), RBC (Alonso and Magdalena, 2011), Integrity I (Antonelli et al, 2011), Transparency (Pulkkinen et al, 2008), Cointension (Mencar et al, 2011) or RMI (Galende et al, 2014).…”
Section: Accuracy-interpretability Trade-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another view is based on an existing, improved FRBS: approaches based on rule selection and MOEA are developed in Galende et al (2012); Márquez et al (2012); Pulkkinen et al (2008); Ishibuchi and Nojima (2007); Ishibuchi et al (2001) and Ishibuchi et al (1997). A GA tuning based approach can be found in Roubos and Setnes (2001), while MOEA based rule selection and tuning is used by Galende et al (2014); Fazzolari et al (2013b); Alcalá et al (2011) and Gacto et al (2010). This view is used in this approach.…”
Section: Accuracy-interpretability Trade-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification rate and the error rate of S are often used as the accuracy measures, while the number of rules and the number of conditions in S are often used as the complexity measures. Well-designed interpretability measures are also used instead of the complexity measures in some studies [14], [15]. In recent years, multiobjective GFS (MoGFS) have attracted increasing attention in the research field of GFS [1]- [3], [7], [12], [23].…”
Section: Fitness(s) = W 1 Accuracy(s) − W 2 Complexity(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim is to propose a new extension of the wellknown linguistic Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems (FRBS) [19][20][21] that is specifically designed for regression problems. This is done by combining new linguistic fuzzy grammar and a novel interpretable linear extension in order to obtain the highest possible transparency level, as this is our main objective, as well as a rule set of no more than 6 or 7 rules [22] for regression problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we propose an enhanced multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) in two stages (learning linguistic partitions and rules, plus tuning and rule selection) to optimize accuracy together with some well-known interpretability measures from the specialized literature that account for the number of rules and the overlap in the linguistic terms and/or rule inconsistency (the GM3M and RMI indexes [19,21]). The main contribution in this algorithmic part is the inclusion of a new linguistic tree-based Rule Base (RB) learning algorithm that adapts perfectly to the new type of rules and therefore enhances the said evolutionary learning method, as node conditions can be fuzzified and the linear extension can be obtained at the tree leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%