‘Comparison and correlation of the maxillary sinus dimensions in various craniofacial patterns: A CBCT Study’

Kumar, Harshit Atul; Nayak, U S Krishna; Kuttappa, M N

doi:10.12688/f1000research.110889.2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

(28 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, the relationship of maxillary sinus dimensions to craniofacial morphology was assessed using CBCT [25][26][27]. However, most researchers have focused on the ANB angle or mandibular plane angle and evaluated the effects of the mandibular plane angle and/or the ANB angle on maxillary sinus dimensions and volume.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Dimensions

Tanaka,

Yamada,

Higashino

et al. 2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study aimed to investigate the correlation of craniofacial morphology with maxillary sinus morphology and to evaluate whether orthodontic treatment facilitates maxillary sinus enlargement in adults. Materials and methods A total of 45 adult women underwent cephalography and computed tomography before and after orthodontic treatment. All participants were classified into three groups: skeletal class I, II, and III. The average dimensions and volume of the maxillary sinus were calculated in each subgroup. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the correlations of maxillary sinus dimensions with 20 cephalometric variables. Results Before treatment, the maxillary sinus width, height, depth, and volume were 32.2 ± 3.9 mm, 39.5 ± 3.8 mm, 38.6 ± 1.8 mm, and 36,179.3 ± 5,454.0 mm 3 in skeletal class I, 33.9 ± 6.2 mm, 37.3 ± 3.5 mm, 38.6 ± 2.4 mm, and 34,729.8 ± 6,686.6 mm 3 in skeletal class II, and 32.0 ± 4.3 mm, 41.8 ± 5.0 mm, 38.0 ± 2.8 mm, and 35,592.3 ± 10,334.3 mm 3 in skeletal class III, respectively. Despite no significant differences in maxillary sinus width, depth, or volume, the height was significantly lower in the skeletal class II than in the other two. Regardless of the skeletal pattern, maxillary sinus height and volume increased considerably after treatment. Moreover, the maxillary sinus width was substantially involved in pretreatment U1 to SN and overbite and posttreatment U1 to NA and overjet. Conclusion Except for the height, the maxillary sinus dimensions were almost similar, irrespective of the skeletal classification. The posttreatment sinus height and volume were significantly greater than the pretreatment values, although the sinus width and length showed no significant changes during orthodontic treatment. This implies that orthodontic treatment may facilitate the enlargement of the maxillary sinus even after physical growth.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Dimensions

Tanaka,

Yamada,

Higashino

et al. 2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Different Cephalometric Characteristics in Orthodontics

Alqahtani,

Basuhail,

Alsulaimani

et al. 2023

Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the maxillary sinus volume (MSV) in both genders in a Saudi sample and among different skeletal patterns. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 52 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 18 years or older individuals with complete dentition and healthy medical history. MSV was measured as the mean value of both sides in cubic millimeters (mm3) using OnDemand three-dimensional™ Dental. Cephalometric tracings were conducted on cephalograms obtained from CBCT scans. The beta, A × B, and Frankfort-mandibular plane angles were selected to determine the sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns of the study subjects. Descriptive statistics and other tests were conducted. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: Fifty-two CBCT scans were included in this study (23 males and 29 females), with a mean age of 36 (±14) years. The mean MSV was 14887 (±5030.79) mm3. Males had statistically significantly larger MSV (16517 ± 5335 mm3) compared with females (13595 ± 4,452 mm3) (P = 0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in MSV among all other cephalometric measurements (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The MSV in the studied Saudi sample was larger among males. However, different skeletal patterns have no statistically significant differences in MSV.

show abstract

‘Comparison and correlation of the maxillary sinus dimensions in various craniofacial patterns: A CBCT Study’

Cited by 2 publications

References 25 publications

Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Dimensions

Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Dimensions

The Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Different Cephalometric Characteristics in Orthodontics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About