2016
DOI: 10.14203/instrumentasi.v40i1.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Correlation Among Measurement Results of Observatory, Hellman, and Tipping Bucket Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, on hourly time scales (Figure 3), AWS shows a better correlation than MRG. Although the performance evaluation of MRG and AWS operated by BMKG showed very good accuracy [45,95], it is possible for these rain gauges to have errors in operation. AWS uses the automatic tipping-bucket rain gauge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, on hourly time scales (Figure 3), AWS shows a better correlation than MRG. Although the performance evaluation of MRG and AWS operated by BMKG showed very good accuracy [45,95], it is possible for these rain gauges to have errors in operation. AWS uses the automatic tipping-bucket rain gauge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the IUT is a rain gauge especially a tipping bucket sensor. The sensor will not be discussed anymore, but can be obtained for example from , Maftukhah et al (2016Maftukhah et al ( , 2019, Prakosa et al (2016Prakosa et al ( , 2018, Wijonarko ( , 2018, Qiyaman et al (2018aQiyaman et al ( , 2018b).…”
Section: Basic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, all types of rain gauges can be divided into catching and non-catching instruments (Lanza & Stagi, 2002;Lanza, 2005;Lanza et al, 2007;Lanza & Stagi, 2008;Lanza & Stagi, 2009;Lanza, Vuerich, & Gnecco, 2010;Lanza, Stagnaro, & Cauteruccio, 2018). Although there are some kinds of catching rain gauges such as double decker tipping bucket , the most favorite types are observatory, Hellmann, and tipping bucket (Maftukhah, Wijonarko, & Rustandi, 2016). Even, remote-sensing measurements (satellite, radar, etc) can not substitute ground-based observations (Plummer, Allsopp, & Lopez, 2003).…”
Section: Basic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%