2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants

Abstract: The objective of this study was to elucidate the toxicity of widely used penetrating cryoprotective agents (CPAs) to mammalian oocytes. To this end, mouse metaphase II (M II) oocytes were exposed to 1.5 M solutions of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG), or propanediol (PROH) prepared in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. To address the time- and temperature-dependence of the CPA toxicity, M II oocytes were exposed to the aforementioned CPAs at room temperature (RT, ∼… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have suggested that cell volume excursions in excess of ±30% should be avoided when loading CPAs into human oocytes [52; 58; 59]. Considering the variability in oocyte quality [67; 72] and difference in toxicity of various CPAs [68], in the present study, we implemented an additional safety margin and limited volume excursions of oocytes to ±25% when optimizing CPA loading protocols. It should be noted that the simplified version of our two-step protocol for room-temperature loading exceeded our preset cell volume constraints and resulted in a volume excursion of 28%, but still delivered excellent results similar to controls, suggesting that mouse oocytes can tolerate volume excursions beyond ±25% in the presence of Me 2 SO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies have suggested that cell volume excursions in excess of ±30% should be avoided when loading CPAs into human oocytes [52; 58; 59]. Considering the variability in oocyte quality [67; 72] and difference in toxicity of various CPAs [68], in the present study, we implemented an additional safety margin and limited volume excursions of oocytes to ±25% when optimizing CPA loading protocols. It should be noted that the simplified version of our two-step protocol for room-temperature loading exceeded our preset cell volume constraints and resulted in a volume excursion of 28%, but still delivered excellent results similar to controls, suggesting that mouse oocytes can tolerate volume excursions beyond ±25% in the presence of Me 2 SO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that 1.5 M Me 2 SO solution was prepared in PBS supplemented with BSA (i.e., in the absence of any appreciable Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ). In our previous study, when mouse M II oocytes were exposed to 1.5 M Me 2 SO prepared in PBS containing 10% FBS and thus small amounts of extracellular Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ , no significant adverse effect was observed [68]. We have performed similar experiments with PROH (i.e., exposure of mouse oocytes to 1.5 M PROH in the presence and absence of extracellular Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ ) and obtained similar results in our recent study, suggesting that extracellular presence/absence of Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ modulates cell injury induced by CPA loading [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, both DMSO and ethylene glycol were found to induce a transient increase in intra-cellular calcium in mouse oocytes [14] and further, DMSO was responsible for release of calcium from intracellular stores, as opposed to the influx of calcium from extracellular culture media generated by ethylene glycol exposure. For mouse oocyte cryopreservation, the potential for cryoprotectant toxicity was reduced by eliminating or combining cryoprotectants, and exposing oocytes to these agents at room temperature rather than 37°C [15]. In regard to post-fertilization embryonic cells, recent reports demonstrate cellular/genetic perturbations following DMSO exposure for mouse blastocysts [16], mouse embryoid bodies [17], and human induced pluripotent stem cells [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%