2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42965-021-00210-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison among allometric models for tree biomass estimation using non-destructive trees’ data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the models' performances and output errors were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk Normality test and the errors were plotted to determine if they were normally distributed [52]. Based on the relatively better-performing model that considered field characteristics as suggested [43,44], the selected model [i.e., predicted biomass = 0.0509 × wood density of particular species × DBH t ˆ2 × total height of the trees t , t = time in year ranging from 1 to rotation age of the tree species, and other variables have their usual meanings and units] was used for the estimation and prediction of biomass using regression analysis because of its merit and commonality in practice [53]. All statistical analyses and tests were conducted using R libraries of version 4.2 such as multcom, agricolae, lm, glm [54] and MS Excel 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the models' performances and output errors were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk Normality test and the errors were plotted to determine if they were normally distributed [52]. Based on the relatively better-performing model that considered field characteristics as suggested [43,44], the selected model [i.e., predicted biomass = 0.0509 × wood density of particular species × DBH t ˆ2 × total height of the trees t , t = time in year ranging from 1 to rotation age of the tree species, and other variables have their usual meanings and units] was used for the estimation and prediction of biomass using regression analysis because of its merit and commonality in practice [53]. All statistical analyses and tests were conducted using R libraries of version 4.2 such as multcom, agricolae, lm, glm [54] and MS Excel 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study estimated the above-ground tree biomass (AGTB) using an allometric equation as suggested by Chave et al (2005) (for the category of moist forests, of which Gorkha district falls under this) [43], which has relatively better performance compared with other models [44].…”
Section: Biomass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%