2018
DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_86_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA® ProSeal in children under controlled ventilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mean difference of 1.6 s (95% CI 0.09–3.12) between the two groups does not account for clinical significance. Similar to our findings mean time taken to insert Ambu AuraGain has been reported between 12 and 13 s 3,4 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the mean difference of 1.6 s (95% CI 0.09–3.12) between the two groups does not account for clinical significance. Similar to our findings mean time taken to insert Ambu AuraGain has been reported between 12 and 13 s 3,4 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a comparison study in children with LMA supreme, Ambu AuraGain has shown a mean OLP of 19 cm H 2 O 4 . Ambu AuraGain has also been shown to have higher OLP compared with proseal LMA, with a mean OLP of 23.3 ± 4.6 cm H 2 O 3 . The authors attributed the higher OLP to the preformed shape and slightly larger cuff size of the Ambu AuraGain compared with the proseal LMA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations