2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2533371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Wealth - Data Quality of the HFCS

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis for the oversampling in Germany is the geographic information about taxable income, whereas the French oversampling is based on the individual information about taxable net wealth. (Tiefensee and Grabka, 2014). It is important to keep these differences in survey methodology in mind when comparing the results of our four countries.…”
Section: Household Finance and Consumption Survey (Hfcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis for the oversampling in Germany is the geographic information about taxable income, whereas the French oversampling is based on the individual information about taxable net wealth. (Tiefensee and Grabka, 2014). It is important to keep these differences in survey methodology in mind when comparing the results of our four countries.…”
Section: Household Finance and Consumption Survey (Hfcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For a detailed discussion of asset valuation in the HFCS, see the European Central Bank (2013a) report; and for an in‐depth analysis of issues in cross‐country comparability, see Tiefensee and Grabka ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless Tiefensee & Grabka (2015) show that net worth positions are not unlimitedly comparable between all countries due to 4 Our unit of analysis is, therefore, the household and not the individual. 5 Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Greece, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain.…”
Section: Country Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%