2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19030535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing UAV-Based Technologies and RGB-D Reconstruction Methods for Plant Height and Biomass Monitoring on Grass Ley

Abstract: Pastures are botanically diverse and difficult to characterize. Digital modeling of pasture biomass and quality by non-destructive methods can provide highly valuable support for decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate aerial and on-ground methods to characterize grass ley fields, estimating plant height, biomass and volume, using digital grass models. Two fields were sampled, one timothy-dominant and the other ryegrass-dominant. Both sensing systems allowed estimation of biomass, volume and plant height… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the R 2 of plant height vs. log-transformed DHY was more variable (R 2 = 0.12-0.65) than NDVI across seasons. Moreover, correlations were slightly lower compared to previous results in the literature [13,55]. Specifically, lower accuracies were obtained from the spring 2018 experiments due to early flower initiation from drought stresses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…In the current study, the R 2 of plant height vs. log-transformed DHY was more variable (R 2 = 0.12-0.65) than NDVI across seasons. Moreover, correlations were slightly lower compared to previous results in the literature [13,55]. Specifically, lower accuracies were obtained from the spring 2018 experiments due to early flower initiation from drought stresses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Viljanen et al () used data from four harvesting dates (all in June) with 96 samples of a mixture of timothy and meadow fescue to generate multiple linear regression (MLR) and RF models. Finally, Rueda‐Ayala et al () compared an on‐ground system with an UAV in a limited number of plots ( n = 10) in two different species mixtures using simple linear regression models to estimate DMY and the UAV‐based system showed a lower capability in the estimation ( R 2 < .6). While these studies illustrate the potential of RGB and multispectral sensors to provide estimations of DMY of crops in general and forage grasses in particular, they were rather limited in the number of plots, conditions tested and/or growth stages considered, which may limit the general applicability of the results found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of a Kinect sensor in the acquisition of soybean canopy information in natural light conditions could reduce costs and increase the utilization of imaging techniques in the field of phenotypic research, benefitting the plant science community [46,47]. The image acquisition platform has been demonstrated to be capable of using Kinect sensor for data collection in a high-throughput fashion under natural light conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%