2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2003.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing two types of internal tags in juvenile blue crabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…E, estimated from a telemetry experiment described in Davis et al (2004b), was time-dependent and estimated as a step function: for the first 2 weeks E = 1, after which E = 0.833. Most likely, more than 16.7% of the hatchery crabs emigrated from the embayment over time (e.g., see Hines et al 1995); however, with no data to support this hypothesis (because juvenile crabs molt often, telemetry can only be used for the duration of one molting cycle), we used this conservative estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E, estimated from a telemetry experiment described in Davis et al (2004b), was time-dependent and estimated as a step function: for the first 2 weeks E = 1, after which E = 0.833. Most likely, more than 16.7% of the hatchery crabs emigrated from the embayment over time (e.g., see Hines et al 1995); however, with no data to support this hypothesis (because juvenile crabs molt often, telemetry can only be used for the duration of one molting cycle), we used this conservative estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions are referred to as release areas. The ambit scale of crabs in this small size range has not been studied in detail, but previous studies of juvenile crabs in similar areas (van Montfrans et al 1991) and in these coves (Davis et al 2004b) indicated that few emigrated over a period of several weeks.…”
Section: Enhancement and Control Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peso corporal y talla (longitud total) (media ± desviación estándar) del experimento 1 y 2 a los 30 días de evaluación para cachama blanca (Piaractus brachypomus). Las diferencias anatómicas, las diferentes condiciones de calidad de agua, las diversas magnitudes de resistencia, la susceptibilidad a la manipulación y términos de crecimiento, son unas de las razones que fundamentan su evaluación para cada especie (Davis et al, 2004, Jerry et al, 2001. En este sentido, para este estudio la ausencia de diferencias en el peso, talla y tasa de crecimiento específica entre peces marcados y no marcados en ambos experimentos, concuerda con lo reportado por Soula et al, (2012) en el bocinegro (Pagrus pagrus), quien evaluó el VIE en relación con el crecimiento, mortalidad, tiempo de manejo y tasa de perdida, encontrando que no existió efecto alguno sobre las variables, al igual que lo demostrado por otros autores (Soula et al, 2009, Zeeh y Wood, 2009, Liu et al, 2011.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…According to several studies on a large spectrum of fish, crustacean, reptilian, and amphibian species, VIE tags have no effect on mortality and growth (e.g., Buchan, Sun, & Wagner, 2005;Catalano, Chipps, Bouchard, & Wahl, 2001;Claverie & Smith, 2007;Davis, Young-Williams, Hines, & Zmora, 2004;Imbert et al, 2007;Malone, Forrester, & Steele, 1999;Regester & Woosley, 2005). According to Imbert et al, VIE tags do not affect the displacement behavior of tagged glass eels.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%